2013DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Open access

Inter-Journal Knowledge Map using Citation Information and Subject Classification

Seok-Hyoung Lee, Seoyoung Jeong, Kwang-Young Kim

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

In this paper, citation data that is cross‐referenced among journals is established using reference data in CrossRef. Using the established citation data, cited information is created and using DDC classification information, journals are classified. Using this inter‐journal citation information, subject classification and time information, the relationship among the journals is analyzed. In other words, the relationship among frequently cited journals is expressed with DDC classification, and whether the subject classification is inter‐related to journals and whether the subject journals are relevant are analyzed by year. As a result, it is shown that most journals are co‐related and that technology (600) in particular is strongly co‐related to natural science and mathematics (500) and social sciences (300). However, the analysis of journals by year shows that researches in the field of language (400) are conducted by heavily citing natural science and mathematics (500) but not the other way around with only a few citations after the year 2000. It is shown that there could be fusion among disciplines of no direct relations to each other.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper, citation data that is cross‐referenced among journals is established using reference data in CrossRef. Using the established citation data, cited information is created and using DDC classification information, journals are classified. Using this inter‐journal citation information, subject classification and time information, the relationship among the journals is analyzed. In other words, the relationship among frequently cited journals is expressed with DDC classification, and whether the subject classification is inter‐related to journals and whether the subject journals are relevant are analyzed by year. As a result, it is shown that most journals are co‐related and that technology (600) in particular is strongly co‐related to natural science and mathematics (500) and social sciences (300). However, the analysis of journals by year shows that researches in the field of language (400) are conducted by heavily citing natural science and mathematics (500) but not the other way around with only a few citations after the year 2000. It is shown that there could be fusion among disciplines of no direct relations to each other.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper, citation data that is cross‐referenced among journals is established using reference data in CrossRef. Using the established citation data, cited information is created and using DDC classification information, journals are classified. Using this inter‐journal citation information, subject classification and time information, the relationship among the journals is analyzed. In other words, the relationship among frequently cited journals is expressed with DDC classification, and whether the subject classification is inter‐related to journals and whether the subject journals are relevant are analyzed by year. As a result, it is shown that most journals are co‐related and that technology (600) in particular is strongly co‐related to natural science and mathematics (500) and social sciences (300). However, the analysis of journals by year shows that researches in the field of language (400) are conducted by heavily citing natural science and mathematics (500) but not the other way around with only a few citations after the year 2000. It is shown that there could be fusion among disciplines of no direct relations to each other.

Key concepts: Subject (documents), Citation, Computer science, Information retrieval, Field (mathematics), Information science, Citation analysis, Natural science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Inter-Journal Knowledge Map using Citation Information and Subject Classification — Research Paper | ScholarLens