Certification and education as determinants of nurse practitioner scope of practice: An investigation of the rules and regulations defining NP scope of practice in the United States
Christopher W. Blackwell, Donna Felber Neff
Abstract
Christopher W. Blackwell, Donna Felber Neff
Abstract
PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND: In 2008, a consortium of advanced practice nursing organizations authored the Consensus Model for APRN Regulation: Licensure, Accreditation, Certification, and Education. The document's aim is to provide guidance for states to adopt uniformity in the regulation of advanced practice registered nurse roles. Despite a target date to complete that work by 2015, there remains an extensive amount of variation in how states define the scope of practice (SOP) for nurse practitioners (NPs). DATA SOURCES: Based on the National Council of State Boards of Nursing online database, state (N = 51 [includes the District of Columbia]) NP practice acts and/or rules and regulations documents were examined for language describing SOP for NPs consistent with the language of the advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) Consensus Model. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicated that 18 states and the District of Columbia (37%) had specific regulations defining NP SOP by certification and/or educational preparation while 23 (45%) did not. The remaining nine states (18%) had SOP regulations that were interpreted as being ambiguous in relation to certification and/or educational preparation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings suggest much work is needed to ensure NP SOP accurately reflects NP board-certification and graduate educational preparation.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND: In 2008, a consortium of advanced practice nursing organizations authored the Consensus Model for APRN Regulation: Licensure, Accreditation, Certification, and Education. The document's aim is to provide guidance for states to adopt uniformity in the regulation of advanced practice registered nurse roles. Despite a target date to complete that work by 2015, there remains an extensive amount of variation in how states define the scope of practice (SOP) for nurse practitioners (NPs). DATA SOURCES: Based on the National Council of State Boards of Nursing online database, state (N = 51 [includes the District of Columbia]) NP practice acts and/or rules and regulations documents were examined for language describing SOP for NPs consistent with the language of the advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) Consensus Model. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicated that 18 states and the District of Columbia (37%) had specific regulations defining NP SOP by certification and/or educational preparation while 23 (45%) did not. The remaining nine states (18%) had SOP regulations that were interpreted as being ambiguous in relation to certification and/or educational preparation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings suggest much work is needed to ensure NP SOP accurately reflects NP board-certification and graduate educational preparation.
Key concepts: Certification, Licensure, Scope of practice, Accreditation, Scope (computer science), Nurse practitioners, Advanced practice nursing, Certification and Accreditation