1990•Journal of Environmental HorticultureRequires access

Effect of Pruning on the Growth Inhibiting Activity of Sumagic (Uniconazole)

Jeffrey G. Norcini, Gary W. Knox

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Pruning date was investigated as a possible factor influencing the inhibitory activity of Sumagic (uniconazole) on growth of 6 container grown woody landscape plants. Plants were pruned 1 or 10 days before uniconazole was applied as a foliar spray or medium drench on June 22, 1988. Plant height and width were recorded weekly through November 30, 1988. Pruning date influenced the pattern of growth and/or the final size of plants treated with foliar-applied uniconazole. It also influenced uniconazole's inhibitory activity the first 2 to 3 weeks after application. Uniconazole was most effective on Pyracantha and Ligustrum lucidum the first 2 to 3 weeks after treatment if applied 1 day after pruning. Drench applications resulted in greater growth inhibition than foliar sprays; however, drench treatments caused unacceptable reduction in plant size.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Pruning date was investigated as a possible factor influencing the inhibitory activity of Sumagic (uniconazole) on growth of 6 container grown woody landscape plants. Plants were pruned 1 or 10 days before uniconazole was applied as a foliar spray or medium drench on June 22, 1988. Plant height and width were recorded weekly through November 30, 1988. Pruning date influenced the pattern of growth and/or the final size of plants treated with foliar-applied uniconazole. It also influenced uniconazole's inhibitory activity the first 2 to 3 weeks after application. Uniconazole was most effective on Pyracantha and Ligustrum lucidum the first 2 to 3 weeks after treatment if applied 1 day after pruning. Drench applications resulted in greater growth inhibition than foliar sprays; however, drench treatments caused unacceptable reduction in plant size.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Pruning date was investigated as a possible factor influencing the inhibitory activity of Sumagic (uniconazole) on growth of 6 container grown woody landscape plants. Plants were pruned 1 or 10 days before uniconazole was applied as a foliar spray or medium drench on June 22, 1988. Plant height and width were recorded weekly through November 30, 1988. Pruning date influenced the pattern of growth and/or the final size of plants treated with foliar-applied uniconazole. It also influenced uniconazole's inhibitory activity the first 2 to 3 weeks after application. Uniconazole was most effective on Pyracantha and Ligustrum lucidum the first 2 to 3 weeks after treatment if applied 1 day after pruning. Drench applications resulted in greater growth inhibition than foliar sprays; however, drench treatments caused unacceptable reduction in plant size.

Key concepts: Pruning, Horticulture, Plant growth, Botany, Biology, Dwarfing, Rootstock

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Pruning on the Growth Inhibiting Activity of Sumagic (Uniconazole) — Research Paper | ScholarLens