1964•The Journal of ImmunologyRequires access

The Incompetence of the Hamster Cheek Pouch Membrane as a Mechanical Barrier to the Movement of Tritiated E. Coli B3 and Tritiated T4 Bacteriophage

David Scott Shepro, Paul S. Cohen, Nora S. Kula

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Summary Tritium labeled Escherichia coli B3 and tritium labeled T4 phage were injected into the hamster cheek pouch or hamster ear, the latter site serving as a control. Eighty per cent of the B3 and 98% of the T4 drained from the pouch within 72 hr. Comparable amounts of B3 and T4 escaped from the ear within the same period of time. These data indicate that the tissues of the cheek pouch do not act as a barrier to antigens the size of E. coli and T4 phage. The observation that the hamster produced phage specific antibodies following injections into the cheek pouch lends additional support to this view. The degree of antibody production was much lower in the cheek pouch-injected animals than in the controls. Based upon the above evidence, a theoretical explanation of the cheek pouch as a privileged site for homografts is here presented.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary Tritium labeled Escherichia coli B3 and tritium labeled T4 phage were injected into the hamster cheek pouch or hamster ear, the latter site serving as a control. Eighty per cent of the B3 and 98% of the T4 drained from the pouch within 72 hr. Comparable amounts of B3 and T4 escaped from the ear within the same period of time. These data indicate that the tissues of the cheek pouch do not act as a barrier to antigens the size of E. coli and T4 phage. The observation that the hamster produced phage specific antibodies following injections into the cheek pouch lends additional support to this view. The degree of antibody production was much lower in the cheek pouch-injected animals than in the controls. Based upon the above evidence, a theoretical explanation of the cheek pouch as a privileged site for homografts is here presented.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary Tritium labeled Escherichia coli B3 and tritium labeled T4 phage were injected into the hamster cheek pouch or hamster ear, the latter site serving as a control. Eighty per cent of the B3 and 98% of the T4 drained from the pouch within 72 hr. Comparable amounts of B3 and T4 escaped from the ear within the same period of time. These data indicate that the tissues of the cheek pouch do not act as a barrier to antigens the size of E. coli and T4 phage. The observation that the hamster produced phage specific antibodies following injections into the cheek pouch lends additional support to this view. The degree of antibody production was much lower in the cheek pouch-injected animals than in the controls. Based upon the above evidence, a theoretical explanation of the cheek pouch as a privileged site for homografts is here presented.

Key concepts: Cheek pouch, Pouch, Cheek, Bacteriophage, Biology, Hamster, Tritium, Tritiated water

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Incompetence of the Hamster Cheek Pouch Membrane as a Mechanical Barrier to the Movement of Tritiated E. Coli B3 and Tritiated T4 Bacteriophage — Research Paper | ScholarLens