1985•IEEE Power Engineering ReviewRequires access

The Great State of Uncertainty In Low-Level Waste Disposal

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Faced with a 1986 deadline for completing their low-level radioactive waste disposal plans, individual states are forming regional compacts to share responsibility. Four compacts involving 24 states are ready for Congressional approval, while the other compacts have yet to receive state ratification. Five states have not yet arranged interstate alignment, and their plans for low-level waste disposal remain uncertain. Texas chose to act alone, and has begun a site selection process. Utilities are not actively involved in the compact negotiations or the site selection process, although the outcome will directly affect future disposal costs and related technological choices. The options for volume reduction include evaporation, supercompaction and incineration. A computer code (VRTECH) analyzes technologies and economic factors for utilities. 5 references, 5 figures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Faced with a 1986 deadline for completing their low-level radioactive waste disposal plans, individual states are forming regional compacts to share responsibility. Four compacts involving 24 states are ready for Congressional approval, while the other compacts have yet to receive state ratification. Five states have not yet arranged interstate alignment, and their plans for low-level waste disposal remain uncertain. Texas chose to act alone, and has begun a site selection process. Utilities are not actively involved in the compact negotiations or the site selection process, although the outcome will directly affect future disposal costs and related technological choices. The options for volume reduction include evaporation, supercompaction and incineration. A computer code (VRTECH) analyzes technologies and economic factors for utilities. 5 references, 5 figures.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Faced with a 1986 deadline for completing their low-level radioactive waste disposal plans, individual states are forming regional compacts to share responsibility. Four compacts involving 24 states are ready for Congressional approval, while the other compacts have yet to receive state ratification. Five states have not yet arranged interstate alignment, and their plans for low-level waste disposal remain uncertain. Texas chose to act alone, and has begun a site selection process. Utilities are not actively involved in the compact negotiations or the site selection process, although the outcome will directly affect future disposal costs and related technological choices. The options for volume reduction include evaporation, supercompaction and incineration. A computer code (VRTECH) analyzes technologies and economic factors for utilities. 5 references, 5 figures.

Key concepts: State (computer science), Environmental science, Waste management, Engineering, Computer science, Algorithm

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Great State of Uncertainty In Low-Level Waste Disposal — Research Paper | ScholarLens