2001•Japanese Circulation Journal-english EditionOpen access

Triple Valve Replacement With Bileaflet Mechanical Valves

Eiki Tayama, Hiroshi Kawano, Tohru Takaseya, Ryoichi Hiratsuka, Takeshi Oda, Nobuhiko Hayashida, Shuji Fukunaga, Shigeaki Aoyagi

Open full text 8 citations

Abstract

A more durable mechanical valve may be a better choice for the tricuspid position than a bioprosthesis when the patient already has mechanical prosthesis in the left side of the heart. Eleven cases of triple valve replacement (total follow-up period, 49.5 patient years), all with mechanical valves, are reviewed to assess optimal valve selection. Nine patients had undergone a total of 12 previous cardiac surgeries. Three patients died in hospital (27.3%), but there were no late deaths among the survivors. Two cases of valve thrombosis in the tricuspid position occurred (linearized incidence: 4.04%/patient years) and 1 of these required reoperation. Because of this high incidence of valve thrombosis, the bileaflet mechanical valve is not considered to be the best choice. Even if mechanical valves are implanted in the left side of the heart, a bioprosthesis may be a better choice at the tricuspid position.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A more durable mechanical valve may be a better choice for the tricuspid position than a bioprosthesis when the patient already has mechanical prosthesis in the left side of the heart. Eleven cases of triple valve replacement (total follow-up period, 49.5 patient years), all with mechanical valves, are reviewed to assess optimal valve selection. Nine patients had undergone a total of 12 previous cardiac surgeries. Three patients died in hospital (27.3%), but there were no late deaths among the survivors. Two cases of valve thrombosis in the tricuspid position occurred (linearized incidence: 4.04%/patient years) and 1 of these required reoperation. Because of this high incidence of valve thrombosis, the bileaflet mechanical valve is not considered to be the best choice. Even if mechanical valves are implanted in the left side of the heart, a bioprosthesis may be a better choice at the tricuspid position.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A more durable mechanical valve may be a better choice for the tricuspid position than a bioprosthesis when the patient already has mechanical prosthesis in the left side of the heart. Eleven cases of triple valve replacement (total follow-up period, 49.5 patient years), all with mechanical valves, are reviewed to assess optimal valve selection. Nine patients had undergone a total of 12 previous cardiac surgeries. Three patients died in hospital (27.3%), but there were no late deaths among the survivors. Two cases of valve thrombosis in the tricuspid position occurred (linearized incidence: 4.04%/patient years) and 1 of these required reoperation. Because of this high incidence of valve thrombosis, the bileaflet mechanical valve is not considered to be the best choice. Even if mechanical valves are implanted in the left side of the heart, a bioprosthesis may be a better choice at the tricuspid position.

Key concepts: Mechanical valve, Cardiology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Triple Valve Replacement With Bileaflet Mechanical Valves — Research Paper | ScholarLens