1983PubMedOpen access

Management of flail chest.

H. A. Miller, George A. Taylor, Allen W. Harrison, Robert Maggisano, Sherif S. Hanna, J. L. de Lacy, HERBERT SHULMAN

Open full text 20 citations

Abstract

This paper compares the management of two groups of patients with flail chest. The 25 patients in group 1 had a flail chest without other significant injuries or shock, whereas the 57 in group 2 had a flail chest with multiple injuries, shock or both. The group 1 patients were treated with repeated multiple intercostal nerve blocks or high segmental epidural analgesia, oxygen, intensive chest physiotherapy, fluid restriction, furosemide diuretics, methylprednisolone sodium succinate and colloid infusion in an intensive care unit. In addition to these measures, the group 2 patients underwent endotracheal intubation and assisted mechanical ventilation with a volume respirator that provided continuous positive airway pressure and positive end-expiratory pressure. Of the 57 group 2 patients 36 required prolonged ventilation, eventually through a tracheostomy, because of severe head injury, pneumonia, severe facial injury, quadriplegia, pre-existing lung disease or severe sepsis. However, tracheostomy was avoided in the other 21 patients in group 2. There were no deaths in group 1, but 8 (14%) of the patients in group 2 died. These results show that avoidance of tracheostomy and ventilation in selected patients with flail chest is consistent with a low morbidity and mortality.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper compares the management of two groups of patients with flail chest. The 25 patients in group 1 had a flail chest without other significant injuries or shock, whereas the 57 in group 2 had a flail chest with multiple injuries, shock or both. The group 1 patients were treated with repeated multiple intercostal nerve blocks or high segmental epidural analgesia, oxygen, intensive chest physiotherapy, fluid restriction, furosemide diuretics, methylprednisolone sodium succinate and colloid infusion in an intensive care unit. In addition to these measures, the group 2 patients underwent endotracheal intubation and assisted mechanical ventilation with a volume respirator that provided continuous positive airway pressure and positive end-expiratory pressure. Of the 57 group 2 patients 36 required prolonged ventilation, eventually through a tracheostomy, because of severe head injury, pneumonia, severe facial injury, quadriplegia, pre-existing lung disease or severe sepsis. However, tracheostomy was avoided in the other 21 patients in group 2. There were no deaths in group 1, but 8 (14%) of the patients in group 2 died. These results show that avoidance of tracheostomy and ventilation in selected patients with flail chest is consistent with a low morbidity and mortality.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper compares the management of two groups of patients with flail chest. The 25 patients in group 1 had a flail chest without other significant injuries or shock, whereas the 57 in group 2 had a flail chest with multiple injuries, shock or both. The group 1 patients were treated with repeated multiple intercostal nerve blocks or high segmental epidural analgesia, oxygen, intensive chest physiotherapy, fluid restriction, furosemide diuretics, methylprednisolone sodium succinate and colloid infusion in an intensive care unit. In addition to these measures, the group 2 patients underwent endotracheal intubation and assisted mechanical ventilation with a volume respirator that provided continuous positive airway pressure and positive end-expiratory pressure. Of the 57 group 2 patients 36 required prolonged ventilation, eventually through a tracheostomy, because of severe head injury, pneumonia, severe facial injury, quadriplegia, pre-existing lung disease or severe sepsis. However, tracheostomy was avoided in the other 21 patients in group 2. There were no deaths in group 1, but 8 (14%) of the patients in group 2 died. These results show that avoidance of tracheostomy and ventilation in selected patients with flail chest is consistent with a low morbidity and mortality.

Key concepts: Flail chest, Medicine, Anesthesia, Mechanical ventilation, Intubation, Surgery, Intensive care unit, Pneumonia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Management of flail chest. — Research Paper | ScholarLens