2000Unpublished venueRequires access

제지방 체중이 운동선수와 비운동선수군에 있어서 골밀도에 미치는 영향

이계영, Eun‐Kyung Kim, 천병옥

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This studies the performance of the dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in evaluating bone mineral density and lean body mass. This method was accurate in quantifying known amounts of lean body mass and bone mineral density. The subjects classified into intercollegiate gymnastics(19.26 years, career 10.5 years, n=15) and non-athlete group(20.07 years, n=7). On the basis of the results of lean body mass of each body region and bone mineral density were analyzed. The results statistically analyzed on these data were summarized as follows; 1. Arms lean body mass showed a low correlation with arms bone mineral density. Legs lean body mass showed a significant correlation with legs bone mineral density(r=0.51, p<.05). Trunk lean body mass showed a low correlation with legs, Trunk bone mineral density. Total lean body mass showed a significant correlation with Arms, Legs, Total bone mineral density(p<.05) in control group. 2. Arms lean body mass showed a significant correlation with arms bone mineral density(r=0.64, p<.05). Legs lean body mass showed a significant correlation with legs bone mineral density(r=0.86, p<.001). Trunk lean body mass showed a significant correlation with trunk bone mineral density(r=0.52, p<.05). Total lean body mass showed a significant correlation with total bone mineral density(r=0.81, p<.001). Arm lean body mass showed a significant with Legs, Trunk, Total bone mineral density(r=0.65-0.88, p<.001). Legs lean body mass showed a significant with Trunk, Total bone mineral density(r=0.81, p<.001) in experimental group. 3. Lean body mass could be very important determinant of bone mineral density. 4. Lean body mass showed a high significant with bone mineral density by effect of training.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This studies the performance of the dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in evaluating bone mineral density and lean body mass. This method was accurate in quantifying known amounts of lean body mass and bone mineral density. The subjects classified into intercollegiate gymnastics(19.26 years, career 10.5 years, n=15) and non-athlete group(20.07 years, n=7). On the basis of the results of lean body mass of each body region and bone mineral density were analyzed. The results statistically analyzed on these data were summarized as follows; 1. Arms lean body mass showed a low correlation with arms bone mineral density. Legs lean body mass showed a significant correlation with legs bone mineral density(r=0.51, p<.05). Trunk lean body mass showed a low correlation with legs, Trunk bone mineral density. Total lean body mass showed a significant correlation with Arms, Legs, Total bone mineral density(p<.05) in control group. 2. Arms lean body mass showed a significant correlation with arms bone mineral density(r=0.64, p<.05). Legs lean body mass showed a significant correlation with legs bone mineral density(r=0.86, p<.001). Trunk lean body mass showed a significant correlation with trunk bone mineral density(r=0.52, p<.05). Total lean body mass showed a significant correlation with total bone mineral density(r=0.81, p<.001). Arm lean body mass showed a significant with Legs, Trunk, Total bone mineral density(r=0.65-0.88, p<.001). Legs lean body mass showed a significant with Trunk, Total bone mineral density(r=0.81, p<.001) in experimental group. 3. Lean body mass could be very important determinant of bone mineral density. 4. Lean body mass showed a high significant with bone mineral density by effect of training.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This studies the performance of the dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in evaluating bone mineral density and lean body mass. This method was accurate in quantifying known amounts of lean body mass and bone mineral density. The subjects classified into intercollegiate gymnastics(19.26 years, career 10.5 years, n=15) and non-athlete group(20.07 years, n=7). On the basis of the results of lean body mass of each body region and bone mineral density were analyzed. The results statistically analyzed on these data were summarized as follows; 1. Arms lean body mass showed a low correlation with arms bone mineral density. Legs lean body mass showed a significant correlation with legs bone mineral density(r=0.51, p<.05). Trunk lean body mass showed a low correlation with legs, Trunk bone mineral density. Total lean body mass showed a significant correlation with Arms, Legs, Total bone mineral density(p<.05) in control group. 2. Arms lean body mass showed a significant correlation with arms bone mineral density(r=0.64, p<.05). Legs lean body mass showed a significant correlation with legs bone mineral density(r=0.86, p<.001). Trunk lean body mass showed a significant correlation with trunk bone mineral density(r=0.52, p<.05). Total lean body mass showed a significant correlation with total bone mineral density(r=0.81, p<.001). Arm lean body mass showed a significant with Legs, Trunk, Total bone mineral density(r=0.65-0.88, p<.001). Legs lean body mass showed a significant with Trunk, Total bone mineral density(r=0.81, p<.001) in experimental group. 3. Lean body mass could be very important determinant of bone mineral density. 4. Lean body mass showed a high significant with bone mineral density by effect of training.

Key concepts: Bone mineral, Lean body mass, Trunk, Bone density, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Chemistry, Body weight, Internal medicine

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
제지방 체중이 운동선수와 비운동선수군에 있어서 골밀도에 미치는 영향 — Research Paper | ScholarLens