2012•Duke Law Scholarship Repository (Duke University)Open access

Federal Mens REA Interpretation and the Limits of Culpability’s Relevance

Darryl K. Brown

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

My thanks to the conference participants and hosts for insight at an early stage of this project, to colleagues in a workshop at University of Virginia School of Law for critical feedback on a later draft, and to Richard Bonnie and John Duffy for extensive feedback on

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

My thanks to the conference participants and hosts for insight at an early stage of this project, to colleagues in a workshop at University of Virginia School of Law for critical feedback on a later draft, and to Richard Bonnie and John Duffy for extensive feedback on

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

My thanks to the conference participants and hosts for insight at an early stage of this project, to colleagues in a workshop at University of Virginia School of Law for critical feedback on a later draft, and to Richard Bonnie and John Duffy for extensive feedback on

Key concepts: Mens rea, Culpability, Punishment (psychology), Law, Criminal law, Supreme court, Judicial interpretation, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Federal Mens REA Interpretation and the Limits of Culpability’s Relevance — Research Paper | ScholarLens