2012European Respiratory JournalRequires access

Acute vasoreactivity testing with sildenafil vs nitric oxide in patients with PAH

Katrin Milger, Henning Tiede, Janine F. Felix, Friedrich Grimminger, Werner Seeger, Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Vasoreactivity testing with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is recommended in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) because of therapeutical and prognostic implications. Sildenafil is a promising agent for acute vasoreactivity testing since it is more stable and easier to handle than iNO. But it is not known if the acute responses to sildenafil and NO are equal. Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare acute vasoreactivity in response to sildenafil vs iNO in patients with PAH. Methods: In this retrospective, open-label, and single-centre study we included all patients who were admitted to our adult pulmonary hypertension unit from 2002 to 2011, met the criteria for PAH, and underwent vasoreactivity testing with iNO and sildenafil. Results: 198 patients were included. 9.6% of the patients met the responder criteria (as defined by the current guidelines) for iNO and 11.6% for sildenafil. Intra-individually, the responses in mPAP and cardiac index (CI) after sildenafil and NO administration correlated (r mPAP = 0.516, p CI =0.521, p NO =2.40±0.69l/min/m 2 ; CI sildenafil =2.56±0.76l/min/m 2 ). Applying the current response criteria, the sensitivity to detect NO-responders by sildenafil vasoreactivity was 81.3%, the specificity was 94%, the positive predicitive value was 56%. Conclusions: In PAH patients the vasoreactive response to sildenafil is stronger than to iNO. The intra-individual vasoreactive responses to both drugs correlate. The sensitivity to detect NO-responders by using sildenafil for vasoreactivity testing was moderate, but the positive predictive value was low.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: Vasoreactivity testing with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is recommended in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) because of therapeutical and prognostic implications. Sildenafil is a promising agent for acute vasoreactivity testing since it is more stable and easier to handle than iNO. But it is not known if the acute responses to sildenafil and NO are equal. Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare acute vasoreactivity in response to sildenafil vs iNO in patients with PAH. Methods: In this retrospective, open-label, and single-centre study we included all patients who were admitted to our adult pulmonary hypertension unit from 2002 to 2011, met the criteria for PAH, and underwent vasoreactivity testing with iNO and sildenafil. Results: 198 patients were included. 9.6% of the patients met the responder criteria (as defined by the current guidelines) for iNO and 11.6% for sildenafil. Intra-individually, the responses in mPAP and cardiac index (CI) after sildenafil and NO administration correlated (r mPAP = 0.516, p CI =0.521, p NO =2.40±0.69l/min/m 2 ; CI sildenafil =2.56±0.76l/min/m 2 ). Applying the current response criteria, the sensitivity to detect NO-responders by sildenafil vasoreactivity was 81.3%, the specificity was 94%, the positive predicitive value was 56%. Conclusions: In PAH patients the vasoreactive response to sildenafil is stronger than to iNO. The intra-individual vasoreactive responses to both drugs correlate. The sensitivity to detect NO-responders by using sildenafil for vasoreactivity testing was moderate, but the positive predictive value was low.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: Vasoreactivity testing with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is recommended in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) because of therapeutical and prognostic implications. Sildenafil is a promising agent for acute vasoreactivity testing since it is more stable and easier to handle than iNO. But it is not known if the acute responses to sildenafil and NO are equal. Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare acute vasoreactivity in response to sildenafil vs iNO in patients with PAH. Methods: In this retrospective, open-label, and single-centre study we included all patients who were admitted to our adult pulmonary hypertension unit from 2002 to 2011, met the criteria for PAH, and underwent vasoreactivity testing with iNO and sildenafil. Results: 198 patients were included. 9.6% of the patients met the responder criteria (as defined by the current guidelines) for iNO and 11.6% for sildenafil. Intra-individually, the responses in mPAP and cardiac index (CI) after sildenafil and NO administration correlated (r mPAP = 0.516, p CI =0.521, p NO =2.40±0.69l/min/m 2 ; CI sildenafil =2.56±0.76l/min/m 2 ). Applying the current response criteria, the sensitivity to detect NO-responders by sildenafil vasoreactivity was 81.3%, the specificity was 94%, the positive predicitive value was 56%. Conclusions: In PAH patients the vasoreactive response to sildenafil is stronger than to iNO. The intra-individual vasoreactive responses to both drugs correlate. The sensitivity to detect NO-responders by using sildenafil for vasoreactivity testing was moderate, but the positive predictive value was low.

Key concepts: Sildenafil, Medicine, Nitric oxide, Pulmonary hypertension, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Acute vasoreactivity testing with sildenafil vs nitric oxide in patients with PAH — Research Paper | ScholarLens