2015Geophysical Research LettersOpen access

Spread of model climate sensitivity linked to double‐Intertropical Convergence Zone bias

Baijun Tian

Open full text 125 citations

Abstract

Abstract Despite decades of climate research and model development, two outstanding problems still plague the latest global climate models (GCMs): the double‐Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) bias and the 2−5°C spread of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS). Here we show that the double‐ITCZ bias and ECS in 44 GCMs from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 3/5 are negatively correlated. The models with weak (strong) double‐ITCZ biases have high (low)‐ECS values of ~4.1(2.2)°C. This indicates that the double‐ITCZ bias is a new emergent constraint for ECS based on which ECS might be in the higher end of its range (~4.0°C) and most models might have underestimated ECS. In addition, we argue that the double‐ITCZ bias can physically affect both cloud and water vapor feedbacks (thus ECS) and is a more easily measured emergent constraint for ECS than previous ones. It can be used as a performance metric for evaluating and comparing different GCMs.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Despite decades of climate research and model development, two outstanding problems still plague the latest global climate models (GCMs): the double‐Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) bias and the 2−5°C spread of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS). Here we show that the double‐ITCZ bias and ECS in 44 GCMs from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 3/5 are negatively correlated. The models with weak (strong) double‐ITCZ biases have high (low)‐ECS values of ~4.1(2.2)°C. This indicates that the double‐ITCZ bias is a new emergent constraint for ECS based on which ECS might be in the higher end of its range (~4.0°C) and most models might have underestimated ECS. In addition, we argue that the double‐ITCZ bias can physically affect both cloud and water vapor feedbacks (thus ECS) and is a more easily measured emergent constraint for ECS than previous ones. It can be used as a performance metric for evaluating and comparing different GCMs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 125 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Despite decades of climate research and model development, two outstanding problems still plague the latest global climate models (GCMs): the double‐Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) bias and the 2−5°C spread of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS). Here we show that the double‐ITCZ bias and ECS in 44 GCMs from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 3/5 are negatively correlated. The models with weak (strong) double‐ITCZ biases have high (low)‐ECS values of ~4.1(2.2)°C. This indicates that the double‐ITCZ bias is a new emergent constraint for ECS based on which ECS might be in the higher end of its range (~4.0°C) and most models might have underestimated ECS. In addition, we argue that the double‐ITCZ bias can physically affect both cloud and water vapor feedbacks (thus ECS) and is a more easily measured emergent constraint for ECS than previous ones. It can be used as a performance metric for evaluating and comparing different GCMs.

Key concepts: Intertropical Convergence Zone, Climatology, Convergence (economics), Constraint (computer-aided design), Environmental science, Sensitivity (control systems), Metric (unit), Climate model

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Spread of model climate sensitivity linked to double‐Intertropical Convergence Zone bias — Research Paper | ScholarLens