2011•전남대학교 세계한상문화연구단 국제학술회의Requires access

Positions as a Korean American Adoption Ethnograper

Kim Nelson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In 2003, I began conducting oral histories interviews with adult Korean American adoptees. I chose oral history narrative as a way to understand meaning in the everyday details, the social and political beliefs and the behaviors of this vibrant community. The oral histories that became central to my research are meaningful in political, social and intimate spheres, as lived experiences of adoptees in the many overlapping Korean adoptee communities in the United States and around the world. Throughout the ethnographic process that built this research, I have made adjustments as my position relative to my own work and to the adoptee community of which I am a part has changed. A key concept in interpreting these shifting sands of positionality is my location as either (and sometimes neither) an insider or an outsider in the community and world of Korean American adoption. This is especially true in communities of Korean adoptees, within which I have access to so-called ―native informants,?complicated by the possibility of my own position as a native informant. This presentation focuses on the oral history and ethnographic methods I use in my research of Korean American adoptees, including the ethical and research implications of my research choices.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 2003, I began conducting oral histories interviews with adult Korean American adoptees. I chose oral history narrative as a way to understand meaning in the everyday details, the social and political beliefs and the behaviors of this vibrant community. The oral histories that became central to my research are meaningful in political, social and intimate spheres, as lived experiences of adoptees in the many overlapping Korean adoptee communities in the United States and around the world. Throughout the ethnographic process that built this research, I have made adjustments as my position relative to my own work and to the adoptee community of which I am a part has changed. A key concept in interpreting these shifting sands of positionality is my location as either (and sometimes neither) an insider or an outsider in the community and world of Korean American adoption. This is especially true in communities of Korean adoptees, within which I have access to so-called ―native informants,?complicated by the possibility of my own position as a native informant. This presentation focuses on the oral history and ethnographic methods I use in my research of Korean American adoptees, including the ethical and research implications of my research choices.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 2003, I began conducting oral histories interviews with adult Korean American adoptees. I chose oral history narrative as a way to understand meaning in the everyday details, the social and political beliefs and the behaviors of this vibrant community. The oral histories that became central to my research are meaningful in political, social and intimate spheres, as lived experiences of adoptees in the many overlapping Korean adoptee communities in the United States and around the world. Throughout the ethnographic process that built this research, I have made adjustments as my position relative to my own work and to the adoptee community of which I am a part has changed. A key concept in interpreting these shifting sands of positionality is my location as either (and sometimes neither) an insider or an outsider in the community and world of Korean American adoption. This is especially true in communities of Korean adoptees, within which I have access to so-called ―native informants,?complicated by the possibility of my own position as a native informant. This presentation focuses on the oral history and ethnographic methods I use in my research of Korean American adoptees, including the ethical and research implications of my research choices.

Key concepts: Ethnography, Insider, Oral history, Meaning (existential), Politics, Gender studies, Sociology, Narrative

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Positions as a Korean American Adoption Ethnograper — Research Paper | ScholarLens