1987•OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Fluidized bed combustion of petroleum cokes: kinetics and catalytic effects

Dennis E. Walsh, G.J. Green

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In the fluid coking process, large quantities of coke particles are circulated between a burner vessel and the fluid coking reactor, with the coke-to-fresh feed ratio generally about 7 to 8 pounds of coke per pound of residual feed. During each burning cycle, a portion of coke equivalent to about 5% of the charge is burned off, and the hot coke particles are then returned to the coker supplying process heat. As a result of this type of repeated burning and coke deposition cycle, the coke is deposited in multiple, thin onion-skin layers. Product coke is withdrawn from the burner vessel, the temperature of which is maintained between /approximately/ 595/degree/ and 650/degree/C. Because the fluid coking process itself takes place at /approximately/ 510/degree/C, followed by the coke being first steam stripped and then burned at /approximately/ 625/degree/C, an essentially dry coke product is produced, i.e., one which is free of residual oils. Although fluid coking is attractive from the viewpoint of higher liquid yield, the coke tends to be higher in sulfur than delayed coke, which could create SO/sub x/ pollution problems in any subsequent combustion application. In addition to the sulfur question is that of the intrinsic combustibility ofmore » fluid coke vs. delayed coke. Since little information is available in the literature on this point, the present work examined whether process differences have any major impact on the combustion characteristics of the coke products. A second goal of this study was the investigation of the possibility of catalytically enhancing coke burning rates by employing separate particle catalysis.« less

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the fluid coking process, large quantities of coke particles are circulated between a burner vessel and the fluid coking reactor, with the coke-to-fresh feed ratio generally about 7 to 8 pounds of coke per pound of residual feed. During each burning cycle, a portion of coke equivalent to about 5% of the charge is burned off, and the hot coke particles are then returned to the coker supplying process heat. As a result of this type of repeated burning and coke deposition cycle, the coke is deposited in multiple, thin onion-skin layers. Product coke is withdrawn from the burner vessel, the temperature of which is maintained between /approximately/ 595/degree/ and 650/degree/C. Because the fluid coking process itself takes place at /approximately/ 510/degree/C, followed by the coke being first steam stripped and then burned at /approximately/ 625/degree/C, an essentially dry coke product is produced, i.e., one which is free of residual oils. Although fluid coking is attractive from the viewpoint of higher liquid yield, the coke tends to be higher in sulfur than delayed coke, which could create SO/sub x/ pollution problems in any subsequent combustion application. In addition to the sulfur question is that of the intrinsic combustibility ofmore » fluid coke vs. delayed coke. Since little information is available in the literature on this point, the present work examined whether process differences have any major impact on the combustion characteristics of the coke products. A second goal of this study was the investigation of the possibility of catalytically enhancing coke burning rates by employing separate particle catalysis.« less

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the fluid coking process, large quantities of coke particles are circulated between a burner vessel and the fluid coking reactor, with the coke-to-fresh feed ratio generally about 7 to 8 pounds of coke per pound of residual feed. During each burning cycle, a portion of coke equivalent to about 5% of the charge is burned off, and the hot coke particles are then returned to the coker supplying process heat. As a result of this type of repeated burning and coke deposition cycle, the coke is deposited in multiple, thin onion-skin layers. Product coke is withdrawn from the burner vessel, the temperature of which is maintained between /approximately/ 595/degree/ and 650/degree/C. Because the fluid coking process itself takes place at /approximately/ 510/degree/C, followed by the coke being first steam stripped and then burned at /approximately/ 625/degree/C, an essentially dry coke product is produced, i.e., one which is free of residual oils. Although fluid coking is attractive from the viewpoint of higher liquid yield, the coke tends to be higher in sulfur than delayed coke, which could create SO/sub x/ pollution problems in any subsequent combustion application. In addition to the sulfur question is that of the intrinsic combustibility ofmore » fluid coke vs. delayed coke. Since little information is available in the literature on this point, the present work examined whether process differences have any major impact on the combustion characteristics of the coke products. A second goal of this study was the investigation of the possibility of catalytically enhancing coke burning rates by employing separate particle catalysis.« less

Key concepts: Coker unit, Coke, Coke strength after reaction, Petroleum coke, Delayed coker, Chemistry, Fluidized bed, Metallurgy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fluidized bed combustion of petroleum cokes: kinetics and catalytic effects — Research Paper | ScholarLens