1985Clinical ChemistryRequires access

Results of dipstick tests, visual inspection, microscopic examination of urine sediment, and microbiological cultures of urine compared for simplifying urinalysis.

Robert H. Christenson, John A. Tucker, Eliezer M. Van Allen

Open publisher page 41 citations

Abstract

Using microscopic sediment examination, reagent dipsticks, visual appearance, and microbiological culture, we studied 196 urine specimens collected under sterile conditions. We conclude that the sensitivities and specificities noted in the comparison of dipstick urinalysis with urine microscopy justify eliminating many microscopic examinations if a procedural flowchart is used. All 33 (16.8%) of the uncontaminated urine specimens showing substantial potential pathogen content on culture had either a turbid appearance or positive results for one or more dipstick tests. A positive dipstick test result for nitrite most consistently indicated that the urine should be cultured.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Using microscopic sediment examination, reagent dipsticks, visual appearance, and microbiological culture, we studied 196 urine specimens collected under sterile conditions. We conclude that the sensitivities and specificities noted in the comparison of dipstick urinalysis with urine microscopy justify eliminating many microscopic examinations if a procedural flowchart is used. All 33 (16.8%) of the uncontaminated urine specimens showing substantial potential pathogen content on culture had either a turbid appearance or positive results for one or more dipstick tests. A positive dipstick test result for nitrite most consistently indicated that the urine should be cultured.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 41 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Using microscopic sediment examination, reagent dipsticks, visual appearance, and microbiological culture, we studied 196 urine specimens collected under sterile conditions. We conclude that the sensitivities and specificities noted in the comparison of dipstick urinalysis with urine microscopy justify eliminating many microscopic examinations if a procedural flowchart is used. All 33 (16.8%) of the uncontaminated urine specimens showing substantial potential pathogen content on culture had either a turbid appearance or positive results for one or more dipstick tests. A positive dipstick test result for nitrite most consistently indicated that the urine should be cultured.

Key concepts: Urinalysis, Dipstick, Urine, Chromatography, Urinary sediment, Medicine, Chemistry, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Results of dipstick tests, visual inspection, microscopic examination of urine sediment, and microbiological cultures of urine compared for simplifying urinalysis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens