2011Journal of ProsthodonticsRequires access

Assessment of Optimal Condylar Position in the Coronal and Axial Planes with Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Kazumi Ikeda, Akira Kawamura, Renie Ikeda

Open publisher page 75 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: No quantitative standards for the optimal position of the mandibular condyle in the glenoid fossa are yet available in the coronal and axial planes. We previously reported measurements of this position in the sagittal plane, using recently developed limited cone-beam computed tomography (LCBCT) capable of imaging the craniofacial structures with high accuracy. In this study, we assessed the optimal condylar position in the coronal and axial planes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 24 joints in 22 asymptomatic patients (10 male, 12 female; age range 12-25 years, mean age 18 years) who had no disc displacement as confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. Their joints had optimum function with the starting and end points of all functional jaw movements coincident with maximum intercuspation. Joint-space distances between the condyle and glenoid fossa were measured at the medial, central, and lateral positions in the coronal plane, and medial and lateral positions in the axial plane. RESULTS: The mean coronal lateral space (CLS), coronal central space (CCS), and coronal medial space (CMS) were 1.8 ± 0.4 mm, 2.7 ± 0.5 mm, and 2.4 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. The ratio of CLS to CCS to CMS was 1.0 to 1.5 to 1.3. The mean axial medial space (AMS) and axial lateral space (ALS) were 2.1 ± 0.6 mm and 2.3 ± 0.6 mm, respectively. There were no significant sex differences in these measurements. CONCLUSIONS: These coronal and axial data, along with previously reported sagittal data, might provide norms for 3D assessment of optimal condylar position with LCBCT.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: No quantitative standards for the optimal position of the mandibular condyle in the glenoid fossa are yet available in the coronal and axial planes. We previously reported measurements of this position in the sagittal plane, using recently developed limited cone-beam computed tomography (LCBCT) capable of imaging the craniofacial structures with high accuracy. In this study, we assessed the optimal condylar position in the coronal and axial planes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 24 joints in 22 asymptomatic patients (10 male, 12 female; age range 12-25 years, mean age 18 years) who had no disc displacement as confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. Their joints had optimum function with the starting and end points of all functional jaw movements coincident with maximum intercuspation. Joint-space distances between the condyle and glenoid fossa were measured at the medial, central, and lateral positions in the coronal plane, and medial and lateral positions in the axial plane. RESULTS: The mean coronal lateral space (CLS), coronal central space (CCS), and coronal medial space (CMS) were 1.8 ± 0.4 mm, 2.7 ± 0.5 mm, and 2.4 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. The ratio of CLS to CCS to CMS was 1.0 to 1.5 to 1.3. The mean axial medial space (AMS) and axial lateral space (ALS) were 2.1 ± 0.6 mm and 2.3 ± 0.6 mm, respectively. There were no significant sex differences in these measurements. CONCLUSIONS: These coronal and axial data, along with previously reported sagittal data, might provide norms for 3D assessment of optimal condylar position with LCBCT.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 75 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: No quantitative standards for the optimal position of the mandibular condyle in the glenoid fossa are yet available in the coronal and axial planes. We previously reported measurements of this position in the sagittal plane, using recently developed limited cone-beam computed tomography (LCBCT) capable of imaging the craniofacial structures with high accuracy. In this study, we assessed the optimal condylar position in the coronal and axial planes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 24 joints in 22 asymptomatic patients (10 male, 12 female; age range 12-25 years, mean age 18 years) who had no disc displacement as confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. Their joints had optimum function with the starting and end points of all functional jaw movements coincident with maximum intercuspation. Joint-space distances between the condyle and glenoid fossa were measured at the medial, central, and lateral positions in the coronal plane, and medial and lateral positions in the axial plane. RESULTS: The mean coronal lateral space (CLS), coronal central space (CCS), and coronal medial space (CMS) were 1.8 ± 0.4 mm, 2.7 ± 0.5 mm, and 2.4 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. The ratio of CLS to CCS to CMS was 1.0 to 1.5 to 1.3. The mean axial medial space (AMS) and axial lateral space (ALS) were 2.1 ± 0.6 mm and 2.3 ± 0.6 mm, respectively. There were no significant sex differences in these measurements. CONCLUSIONS: These coronal and axial data, along with previously reported sagittal data, might provide norms for 3D assessment of optimal condylar position with LCBCT.

Key concepts: Coronal plane, Sagittal plane, Condyle, Magnetic resonance imaging, Cone beam computed tomography, Anatomy, Physics, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessment of Optimal Condylar Position in the Coronal and Axial Planes with Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography — Research Paper | ScholarLens