2011Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Comparative water budgets of a lower and an upper montane cloud forest in the Wet Tropics of northern Australia

David McJannet, Jim Wallace, Paul Reddell

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This chapter presents a comparison of the water budgets of a lower and an upper montane cloud forest in Australia's Wet Tropics region based on field measurements of rainfall, throughfall ( TF ), stemflow ( SF ), transpiration, and cloud water interception ( CWI ). The proportions of total precipitation measured as TF and SF varied between the two sites. At the lower montane cloud forest site (Upper Barron), SF was 7% while TF was just 64%. The upper montane cloud forest site (Bellenden Ker) showed higher SF at 10% while TF was also high at 83%. CWI at the two sites was quantified using a wet-canopy water balance methodology and was found to contribute up to 65% of the monthly water input during dry season months. At Upper Barron, CWI was 19% of average annual precipitation while at Bellenden Ker it was as much as 29%. These measurements resulted in an overall canopy interception evaporation loss of 29% at Upper Barron and just 7% at Bellenden Ker. About 20% of total precipitation was lost through transpiration at Upper Barron and just 5% at Bellenden Ker. Transpiration losses were less than water losses through wet-canopy evaporation at both sites. Both sites have a large annual net surplus of water to sustain streamflow and groundwater recharge. Total evaporation losses at Upper Barron accounted for about 50% of total precipitation input, leaving 50% for runoff and groundwater recharge. […]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter presents a comparison of the water budgets of a lower and an upper montane cloud forest in Australia's Wet Tropics region based on field measurements of rainfall, throughfall ( TF ), stemflow ( SF ), transpiration, and cloud water interception ( CWI ). The proportions of total precipitation measured as TF and SF varied between the two sites. At the lower montane cloud forest site (Upper Barron), SF was 7% while TF was just 64%. The upper montane cloud forest site (Bellenden Ker) showed higher SF at 10% while TF was also high at 83%. CWI at the two sites was quantified using a wet-canopy water balance methodology and was found to contribute up to 65% of the monthly water input during dry season months. At Upper Barron, CWI was 19% of average annual precipitation while at Bellenden Ker it was as much as 29%. These measurements resulted in an overall canopy interception evaporation loss of 29% at Upper Barron and just 7% at Bellenden Ker. About 20% of total precipitation was lost through transpiration at Upper Barron and just 5% at Bellenden Ker. Transpiration losses were less than water losses through wet-canopy evaporation at both sites. Both sites have a large annual net surplus of water to sustain streamflow and groundwater recharge. Total evaporation losses at Upper Barron accounted for about 50% of total precipitation input, leaving 50% for runoff and groundwater recharge. […]

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter presents a comparison of the water budgets of a lower and an upper montane cloud forest in Australia's Wet Tropics region based on field measurements of rainfall, throughfall ( TF ), stemflow ( SF ), transpiration, and cloud water interception ( CWI ). The proportions of total precipitation measured as TF and SF varied between the two sites. At the lower montane cloud forest site (Upper Barron), SF was 7% while TF was just 64%. The upper montane cloud forest site (Bellenden Ker) showed higher SF at 10% while TF was also high at 83%. CWI at the two sites was quantified using a wet-canopy water balance methodology and was found to contribute up to 65% of the monthly water input during dry season months. At Upper Barron, CWI was 19% of average annual precipitation while at Bellenden Ker it was as much as 29%. These measurements resulted in an overall canopy interception evaporation loss of 29% at Upper Barron and just 7% at Bellenden Ker. About 20% of total precipitation was lost through transpiration at Upper Barron and just 5% at Bellenden Ker. Transpiration losses were less than water losses through wet-canopy evaporation at both sites. Both sites have a large annual net surplus of water to sustain streamflow and groundwater recharge. Total evaporation losses at Upper Barron accounted for about 50% of total precipitation input, leaving 50% for runoff and groundwater recharge. […]

Key concepts: Interception, Cloud forest, Throughfall, Environmental science, Hydrology (agriculture), Groundwater recharge, Canopy interception, Stemflow

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative water budgets of a lower and an upper montane cloud forest in the Wet Tropics of northern Australia — Research Paper | ScholarLens