2003New Journal of ChemistryRequires access

Partition of solutes into wet and dry ethers; an LFER analysisElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available: tables of solute descriptors and log P values. Values of log Kw and L. See http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/nj/b3/b303016d/

Michael H. Abraham, Andreas M. Zissimos, William E. Acree

Open publisher page 94 citations

Abstract

Equations based on the Abraham solvation equations are presented for the partition of solutes between water and wet diethyl ether, wet diisopropyl ether, dry diethyl ether, dry diisopropyl ether, dry tetrahydrofuran and dry dioxane, and between the gas phase and wet diethyl ether, dry diethyl ether, dry tetrahydrofuran and dry dioxane. These equations can be used to predict further partition coefficients, and also provide information on the chemical features of the various systems. It is shown that wet diethyl ether is more basic and less hydrophobic than dry diethyl ether, although the differences are quite small. The hydrogen bond basicity of dry tetrahydrofuran and dry dioxane is about the same as that of wet diethyl ether and wet diisopropyl ether, and their hydrophobicity is between that of wet and dry diethyl ether.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Equations based on the Abraham solvation equations are presented for the partition of solutes between water and wet diethyl ether, wet diisopropyl ether, dry diethyl ether, dry diisopropyl ether, dry tetrahydrofuran and dry dioxane, and between the gas phase and wet diethyl ether, dry diethyl ether, dry tetrahydrofuran and dry dioxane. These equations can be used to predict further partition coefficients, and also provide information on the chemical features of the various systems. It is shown that wet diethyl ether is more basic and less hydrophobic than dry diethyl ether, although the differences are quite small. The hydrogen bond basicity of dry tetrahydrofuran and dry dioxane is about the same as that of wet diethyl ether and wet diisopropyl ether, and their hydrophobicity is between that of wet and dry diethyl ether.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 94 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Equations based on the Abraham solvation equations are presented for the partition of solutes between water and wet diethyl ether, wet diisopropyl ether, dry diethyl ether, dry diisopropyl ether, dry tetrahydrofuran and dry dioxane, and between the gas phase and wet diethyl ether, dry diethyl ether, dry tetrahydrofuran and dry dioxane. These equations can be used to predict further partition coefficients, and also provide information on the chemical features of the various systems. It is shown that wet diethyl ether is more basic and less hydrophobic than dry diethyl ether, although the differences are quite small. The hydrogen bond basicity of dry tetrahydrofuran and dry dioxane is about the same as that of wet diethyl ether and wet diisopropyl ether, and their hydrophobicity is between that of wet and dry diethyl ether.

Key concepts: Chemistry, Diisopropyl ether, Diethyl ether, Tetrahydrofuran, Partition coefficient, Taft equation, Ether, Organic chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Partition of solutes into wet and dry ethers; an LFER analysisElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available: tables of solute descriptors and log P values. Values of log Kw and L. See http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/nj/b3/b303016d/ — Research Paper | ScholarLens