2010PubMedRequires access

Advances in volume monitoring in dialysis patients.

Preeti Rout, Gagan Sandhu, Muhammad Khattak, Alexander S. Goldfarb‐Rumyantzev

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Estimating volume status in patients on chronic dialysis is of great clinical value. Both hypervolemia and hypovolemia are associated with serious short term and long term complications, and volume status is often difficult to assess due to multiple factors affecting intravascular and extravascular volume compartments, as well as variability between patients in baseline blood pressures and physical exams. Traditional methods such as estimated dry weight (EDW) and physical exams are often not accurate because of the subjective nature of these indicators and variability between patients' baselines. This can lead to inaccurate volume status estimation and the associated complications. Furthermore, the concept of estimated dry weight is often defined based on measurements of blood pressure which may not accurately reflect volume status. In this review we describe several methods of measuring volume status in dialysis patients that may be more accurate than traditional measurements of blood pressure and dry weight estimation. These methods include dilutional techniques, imaging of vascular structures, use of biomarkers, bioimpedance analysis and online monitoring of biochemical variables during dialysis itself. We also discuss the clinical applicability and comparisons between these methods including the benefits and drawbacks of these methods and areas for future research.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Estimating volume status in patients on chronic dialysis is of great clinical value. Both hypervolemia and hypovolemia are associated with serious short term and long term complications, and volume status is often difficult to assess due to multiple factors affecting intravascular and extravascular volume compartments, as well as variability between patients in baseline blood pressures and physical exams. Traditional methods such as estimated dry weight (EDW) and physical exams are often not accurate because of the subjective nature of these indicators and variability between patients' baselines. This can lead to inaccurate volume status estimation and the associated complications. Furthermore, the concept of estimated dry weight is often defined based on measurements of blood pressure which may not accurately reflect volume status. In this review we describe several methods of measuring volume status in dialysis patients that may be more accurate than traditional measurements of blood pressure and dry weight estimation. These methods include dilutional techniques, imaging of vascular structures, use of biomarkers, bioimpedance analysis and online monitoring of biochemical variables during dialysis itself. We also discuss the clinical applicability and comparisons between these methods including the benefits and drawbacks of these methods and areas for future research.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Estimating volume status in patients on chronic dialysis is of great clinical value. Both hypervolemia and hypovolemia are associated with serious short term and long term complications, and volume status is often difficult to assess due to multiple factors affecting intravascular and extravascular volume compartments, as well as variability between patients in baseline blood pressures and physical exams. Traditional methods such as estimated dry weight (EDW) and physical exams are often not accurate because of the subjective nature of these indicators and variability between patients' baselines. This can lead to inaccurate volume status estimation and the associated complications. Furthermore, the concept of estimated dry weight is often defined based on measurements of blood pressure which may not accurately reflect volume status. In this review we describe several methods of measuring volume status in dialysis patients that may be more accurate than traditional measurements of blood pressure and dry weight estimation. These methods include dilutional techniques, imaging of vascular structures, use of biomarkers, bioimpedance analysis and online monitoring of biochemical variables during dialysis itself. We also discuss the clinical applicability and comparisons between these methods including the benefits and drawbacks of these methods and areas for future research.

Key concepts: Hypervolemia, Medicine, Intravascular volume status, Hypovolemia, Blood volume, Intensive care medicine, Dialysis, Volume (thermodynamics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Advances in volume monitoring in dialysis patients. — Research Paper | ScholarLens