Right to Counsel
Lawrence O. Eitzen
Abstract
Open-access reader
Lawrence O. Eitzen
Abstract
Open-access reader
7 See generally Kamisar & Choper, The Right to Counsel in Minnesota: Some Field Findings and Legal-Policy Observations, 48 MiNm.L. REv. 1, 4-9 (1963).8 372 U.S. 335 (1963).9 372 U.S. 353 (1963).30 316 U.S. 455 (1942), which had held that the totality of the circumstances deter- mined whether a right to counsel existed at the trial level.Among the factors the Court considered important were the intellectual qualifications of the defendant and the complexity of the case.Id. at 472. 11 372 U.S. at 344.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
7 See generally Kamisar & Choper, The Right to Counsel in Minnesota: Some Field Findings and Legal-Policy Observations, 48 MiNm.L. REv. 1, 4-9 (1963).8 372 U.S. 335 (1963).9 372 U.S. 353 (1963).30 316 U.S. 455 (1942), which had held that the totality of the circumstances deter- mined whether a right to counsel existed at the trial level.Among the factors the Court considered important were the intellectual qualifications of the defendant and the complexity of the case.Id. at 472. 11 372 U.S. at 344.
Key concepts: Law, Political science, Business