1968•The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)Open access

Right to Counsel

Lawrence O. Eitzen

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

7 See generally Kamisar & Choper, The Right to Counsel in Minnesota: Some Field Findings and Legal-Policy Observations, 48 MiNm.L. REv. 1, 4-9 (1963).8 372 U.S. 335 (1963).9 372 U.S. 353 (1963).30 316 U.S. 455 (1942), which had held that the totality of the circumstances deter- mined whether a right to counsel existed at the trial level.Among the factors the Court considered important were the intellectual qualifications of the defendant and the complexity of the case.Id. at 472. 11 372 U.S. at 344.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

7 See generally Kamisar & Choper, The Right to Counsel in Minnesota: Some Field Findings and Legal-Policy Observations, 48 MiNm.L. REv. 1, 4-9 (1963).8 372 U.S. 335 (1963).9 372 U.S. 353 (1963).30 316 U.S. 455 (1942), which had held that the totality of the circumstances deter- mined whether a right to counsel existed at the trial level.Among the factors the Court considered important were the intellectual qualifications of the defendant and the complexity of the case.Id. at 472. 11 372 U.S. at 344.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

7 See generally Kamisar & Choper, The Right to Counsel in Minnesota: Some Field Findings and Legal-Policy Observations, 48 MiNm.L. REv. 1, 4-9 (1963).8 372 U.S. 335 (1963).9 372 U.S. 353 (1963).30 316 U.S. 455 (1942), which had held that the totality of the circumstances deter- mined whether a right to counsel existed at the trial level.Among the factors the Court considered important were the intellectual qualifications of the defendant and the complexity of the case.Id. at 472. 11 372 U.S. at 344.

Key concepts: Law, Political science, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Right to Counsel — Research Paper | ScholarLens