2013•European Respiratory JournalRequires access

Analysis of ventilation profile during six minutes walking test: Preliminary study

Giancarlo Piaggi, Manuela Piran, Verónica Rossi, Serena Cirio, Piero Ceriana

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: The evolution of the Respiratory Therapy has led us to cure the patients with comorbidities and/or chronically ill. Moreover, it has induced us to suspect that the six-minutes walking test (6-MWT) might be maximal for subgroup of patients. Aim: Firstly, verify the percentage of patients of whom the 6-MWT has a maximal trend (6-MWT max) by analyzing their ventilation profile during the test. Secondly, identify the threshold characteristics and predictor parameters of patient’ 6-MWT max. Methods: 97 COPD patients performed forced vital capacity (FVC), forced espiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), FEV1/FVC%, maximal voluntary ventilation, inspiratory capacity (CI), minute ventilation (VE) with portable spirometer Spiropalm®, before and immediately after 6-MWT. In the 6-MWT max we calculated the best thresholds using the resampling procedure called “bootstrapping”, in order to discriminate whether the test was a maximal performance or not. The discrimination capability of each threshold was evaluated in terms of accuracy of classification. Results: About 70% of patients recruited achieved a 6-MWT max for symptoms, HR or VE max. About 57% of patients had a maximal performance exclusively from the ventilatory index. The most predictive parameters for a maximal test were: FEV1/FVC < 46% (p < 1x10 -5), FEV1% < 44% (p < 1x10 -5) e MVV < 46.5 (p < 1x10 -5). Conclusion: Preliminary data suggest that FEV1/FVC%, FEV1% and MVV are predictor factors for a maximal performance. The 6MWT may underestimate the real potential of the patient. Instead, it would be more useful to assess, before starting the training, weather the 6-MWT was a maximal test or not.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: The evolution of the Respiratory Therapy has led us to cure the patients with comorbidities and/or chronically ill. Moreover, it has induced us to suspect that the six-minutes walking test (6-MWT) might be maximal for subgroup of patients. Aim: Firstly, verify the percentage of patients of whom the 6-MWT has a maximal trend (6-MWT max) by analyzing their ventilation profile during the test. Secondly, identify the threshold characteristics and predictor parameters of patient’ 6-MWT max. Methods: 97 COPD patients performed forced vital capacity (FVC), forced espiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), FEV1/FVC%, maximal voluntary ventilation, inspiratory capacity (CI), minute ventilation (VE) with portable spirometer Spiropalm®, before and immediately after 6-MWT. In the 6-MWT max we calculated the best thresholds using the resampling procedure called “bootstrapping”, in order to discriminate whether the test was a maximal performance or not. The discrimination capability of each threshold was evaluated in terms of accuracy of classification. Results: About 70% of patients recruited achieved a 6-MWT max for symptoms, HR or VE max. About 57% of patients had a maximal performance exclusively from the ventilatory index. The most predictive parameters for a maximal test were: FEV1/FVC < 46% (p < 1x10 -5), FEV1% < 44% (p < 1x10 -5) e MVV < 46.5 (p < 1x10 -5). Conclusion: Preliminary data suggest that FEV1/FVC%, FEV1% and MVV are predictor factors for a maximal performance. The 6MWT may underestimate the real potential of the patient. Instead, it would be more useful to assess, before starting the training, weather the 6-MWT was a maximal test or not.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: The evolution of the Respiratory Therapy has led us to cure the patients with comorbidities and/or chronically ill. Moreover, it has induced us to suspect that the six-minutes walking test (6-MWT) might be maximal for subgroup of patients. Aim: Firstly, verify the percentage of patients of whom the 6-MWT has a maximal trend (6-MWT max) by analyzing their ventilation profile during the test. Secondly, identify the threshold characteristics and predictor parameters of patient’ 6-MWT max. Methods: 97 COPD patients performed forced vital capacity (FVC), forced espiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), FEV1/FVC%, maximal voluntary ventilation, inspiratory capacity (CI), minute ventilation (VE) with portable spirometer Spiropalm®, before and immediately after 6-MWT. In the 6-MWT max we calculated the best thresholds using the resampling procedure called “bootstrapping”, in order to discriminate whether the test was a maximal performance or not. The discrimination capability of each threshold was evaluated in terms of accuracy of classification. Results: About 70% of patients recruited achieved a 6-MWT max for symptoms, HR or VE max. About 57% of patients had a maximal performance exclusively from the ventilatory index. The most predictive parameters for a maximal test were: FEV1/FVC < 46% (p < 1x10 -5), FEV1% < 44% (p < 1x10 -5) e MVV < 46.5 (p < 1x10 -5). Conclusion: Preliminary data suggest that FEV1/FVC%, FEV1% and MVV are predictor factors for a maximal performance. The 6MWT may underestimate the real potential of the patient. Instead, it would be more useful to assess, before starting the training, weather the 6-MWT was a maximal test or not.

Key concepts: Medicine, Spirometer, COPD, Vital capacity, Physical therapy, Respiratory minute volume, Internal medicine, Ventilation (architecture)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of ventilation profile during six minutes walking test: Preliminary study — Research Paper | ScholarLens