2010Mitchell Hamline Open Access (Hamline University)Open access

TRIBAL CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN STATE AND NATIONAL POLITICS: WELCOME WAGON OR TROJAN HORSE?

Michael D. Oeser

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

awyers have expended much paper and ink learnedly struggling to discover some elegant and hitherto obscure common denominator among the courts' products.Like medieval theologians, they avoid confrontation with their system's fatal paradoxes by immersing their thoughts in trivial comparisons and nice distinctions."1 "The notion that the right to vote and other manifestations of citizenship might reflect defeat for a group rather than victory is not one that many of us are likely to immediately realize, but it is one that American Indian history forces us all to consider."In the 1760s and 1770s, British Parliament passed laws requiring American colonists to pay taxes on everything from playing cards to newspapers to tea.3 Parliament also required the colonists to house the British soldiers sent to enforce these taxes.4 The vast majority of colonists neither consented to nor had a hand in drafting these laws, 1.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

awyers have expended much paper and ink learnedly struggling to discover some elegant and hitherto obscure common denominator among the courts' products.Like medieval theologians, they avoid confrontation with their system's fatal paradoxes by immersing their thoughts in trivial comparisons and nice distinctions."1 "The notion that the right to vote and other manifestations of citizenship might reflect defeat for a group rather than victory is not one that many of us are likely to immediately realize, but it is one that American Indian history forces us all to consider."In the 1760s and 1770s, British Parliament passed laws requiring American colonists to pay taxes on everything from playing cards to newspapers to tea.3 Parliament also required the colonists to house the British soldiers sent to enforce these taxes.4 The vast majority of colonists neither consented to nor had a hand in drafting these laws, 1.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

awyers have expended much paper and ink learnedly struggling to discover some elegant and hitherto obscure common denominator among the courts' products.Like medieval theologians, they avoid confrontation with their system's fatal paradoxes by immersing their thoughts in trivial comparisons and nice distinctions."1 "The notion that the right to vote and other manifestations of citizenship might reflect defeat for a group rather than victory is not one that many of us are likely to immediately realize, but it is one that American Indian history forces us all to consider."In the 1760s and 1770s, British Parliament passed laws requiring American colonists to pay taxes on everything from playing cards to newspapers to tea.3 Parliament also required the colonists to house the British soldiers sent to enforce these taxes.4 The vast majority of colonists neither consented to nor had a hand in drafting these laws, 1.

Key concepts: Sovereignty, State (computer science), Political science, Law, Politics, Tribe, Supreme court, Voting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TRIBAL CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN STATE AND NATIONAL POLITICS: WELCOME WAGON OR TROJAN HORSE? — Research Paper | ScholarLens