2013Advances in petroleum exploration and developmentOpen access

Mechanistic Leak-Detection Modeling for Single Gas-Phase Pipelines: Lessons Learned from Fit to Field-Scale Experimental Data

Ali Edrisi, S. I. Kam

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

The use of pipelines is one of the most popular ways of delivering gas phases as shown by numerous examples in hydrocarbon transportation systems in Arctic regions, oil and gas production facilities in onshore and offshore wells, and municipal gas distribution systems in urban areas. A gas leak from pipelines can cause serious problems not only because of the financial losses associated but also its social and environmental impacts. Therefore, establishing an early leak detection model is vital to safe and secure operations of such pipeline systems. A leak detection model for a single gas phase is presented in this study by using material balance and pressure traverse calculations. The comparison between two steady states, with and without leak, makes it possible to quantify the magnitude of disturbance in two leak detection indicators such as the change in inlet pressure (ΔP in ) and the change in outlet flow rate (Δq out ) in a broad range of leak locations (x leak ) and leak opening sizes (d leak ).  The results from the fit to large-scale experimental data of Scott and Yi (1998) show that the value of leak coefficient (C D ), which is shown to be the single-most important but largely unknown parameter, ranges from 0.55 to 4.11, and should be a function of Reynolds number (N Re ) which is related to leak characteristics such as leak location (x leak ), leak opening size (d leak ), leak rate (q leak ) and system pressure. Further investigations show that between the two leak detection indicators, the change in outlet flow rate (Δq out ) is superior to the change in inlet pressure (ΔP in ) because of larger disturbance, if the pressure drop along the pipeline is relatively small compared to the outlet pressure; otherwise, the change in inlet pressure (ΔP in ) is superior to the change in outlet flow rate (Δq out ). Key words : Leak; Leak detection modeling; Pipeline; Leak coefficient; Gas flow in pipe

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The use of pipelines is one of the most popular ways of delivering gas phases as shown by numerous examples in hydrocarbon transportation systems in Arctic regions, oil and gas production facilities in onshore and offshore wells, and municipal gas distribution systems in urban areas. A gas leak from pipelines can cause serious problems not only because of the financial losses associated but also its social and environmental impacts. Therefore, establishing an early leak detection model is vital to safe and secure operations of such pipeline systems. A leak detection model for a single gas phase is presented in this study by using material balance and pressure traverse calculations. The comparison between two steady states, with and without leak, makes it possible to quantify the magnitude of disturbance in two leak detection indicators such as the change in inlet pressure (ΔP in ) and the change in outlet flow rate (Δq out ) in a broad range of leak locations (x leak ) and leak opening sizes (d leak ).  The results from the fit to large-scale experimental data of Scott and Yi (1998) show that the value of leak coefficient (C D ), which is shown to be the single-most important but largely unknown parameter, ranges from 0.55 to 4.11, and should be a function of Reynolds number (N Re ) which is related to leak characteristics such as leak location (x leak ), leak opening size (d leak ), leak rate (q leak ) and system pressure. Further investigations show that between the two leak detection indicators, the change in outlet flow rate (Δq out ) is superior to the change in inlet pressure (ΔP in ) because of larger disturbance, if the pressure drop along the pipeline is relatively small compared to the outlet pressure; otherwise, the change in inlet pressure (ΔP in ) is superior to the change in outlet flow rate (Δq out ). Key words : Leak; Leak detection modeling; Pipeline; Leak coefficient; Gas flow in pipe

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The use of pipelines is one of the most popular ways of delivering gas phases as shown by numerous examples in hydrocarbon transportation systems in Arctic regions, oil and gas production facilities in onshore and offshore wells, and municipal gas distribution systems in urban areas. A gas leak from pipelines can cause serious problems not only because of the financial losses associated but also its social and environmental impacts. Therefore, establishing an early leak detection model is vital to safe and secure operations of such pipeline systems. A leak detection model for a single gas phase is presented in this study by using material balance and pressure traverse calculations. The comparison between two steady states, with and without leak, makes it possible to quantify the magnitude of disturbance in two leak detection indicators such as the change in inlet pressure (ΔP in ) and the change in outlet flow rate (Δq out ) in a broad range of leak locations (x leak ) and leak opening sizes (d leak ).  The results from the fit to large-scale experimental data of Scott and Yi (1998) show that the value of leak coefficient (C D ), which is shown to be the single-most important but largely unknown parameter, ranges from 0.55 to 4.11, and should be a function of Reynolds number (N Re ) which is related to leak characteristics such as leak location (x leak ), leak opening size (d leak ), leak rate (q leak ) and system pressure. Further investigations show that between the two leak detection indicators, the change in outlet flow rate (Δq out ) is superior to the change in inlet pressure (ΔP in ) because of larger disturbance, if the pressure drop along the pipeline is relatively small compared to the outlet pressure; otherwise, the change in inlet pressure (ΔP in ) is superior to the change in outlet flow rate (Δq out ). Key words : Leak; Leak detection modeling; Pipeline; Leak coefficient; Gas flow in pipe

Key concepts: Leak, Gas leak, Pipeline transport, Petroleum engineering, Environmental science, Inlet, Engineering, Marine engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mechanistic Leak-Detection Modeling for Single Gas-Phase Pipelines: Lessons Learned from Fit to Field-Scale Experimental Data — Research Paper | ScholarLens