2013Journal of historical studiesRequires access

Cultural Relativism vs. Universalism: Female Genital Mutilation, Pragmatic Remedies

Sandra Danial

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

This essay will discuss both universalistic and cultural relativist approaches as applied to female genital mutilation.  Universal and cultural relativist feminists have vastly different views on this matter, my intention is to parallel each view and offer insight on the reason why Western feminists have coined this practice as “mutilation” as opposed to “cutting”.  The intent of this paper is to explore efficient grounds for abolition while proposing antidotes using both cultural relativist and universalist perspectives.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This essay will discuss both universalistic and cultural relativist approaches as applied to female genital mutilation.  Universal and cultural relativist feminists have vastly different views on this matter, my intention is to parallel each view and offer insight on the reason why Western feminists have coined this practice as “mutilation” as opposed to “cutting”.  The intent of this paper is to explore efficient grounds for abolition while proposing antidotes using both cultural relativist and universalist perspectives.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This essay will discuss both universalistic and cultural relativist approaches as applied to female genital mutilation.  Universal and cultural relativist feminists have vastly different views on this matter, my intention is to parallel each view and offer insight on the reason why Western feminists have coined this practice as “mutilation” as opposed to “cutting”.  The intent of this paper is to explore efficient grounds for abolition while proposing antidotes using both cultural relativist and universalist perspectives.

Key concepts: Universalism, Relativism, Cultural relativism, Female circumcision, Epistemology, Sociology, Gender studies, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cultural Relativism vs. Universalism: Female Genital Mutilation, Pragmatic Remedies — Research Paper | ScholarLens