Cultural Relativism vs. Universalism: Female Genital Mutilation, Pragmatic Remedies
Sandra Danial
Abstract
Sandra Danial
Abstract
This essay will discuss both universalistic and cultural relativist approaches as applied to female genital mutilation. Universal and cultural relativist feminists have vastly different views on this matter, my intention is to parallel each view and offer insight on the reason why Western feminists have coined this practice as “mutilation” as opposed to “cutting”. The intent of this paper is to explore efficient grounds for abolition while proposing antidotes using both cultural relativist and universalist perspectives.
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This essay will discuss both universalistic and cultural relativist approaches as applied to female genital mutilation. Universal and cultural relativist feminists have vastly different views on this matter, my intention is to parallel each view and offer insight on the reason why Western feminists have coined this practice as “mutilation” as opposed to “cutting”. The intent of this paper is to explore efficient grounds for abolition while proposing antidotes using both cultural relativist and universalist perspectives.
Key concepts: Universalism, Relativism, Cultural relativism, Female circumcision, Epistemology, Sociology, Gender studies, Philosophy