2013Unpublished venueRequires access

A review of pretreatment methods to separate the different types of pyrites in gold processing

J Binder John, Newell Walter Johnson, Kevin Stewart, D Turner, Dee J. Bradshaw

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Sulfide associated refractory gold ores hold a majority of the gold within the pyrite, which has several forms. The high proportion of the gold atomically dispersed in the pyrite has been confirmed by various mineralogy techniques such as optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and secondary ion mass spectrometry. There are different types of pyrite that exist within a refractory orebody. Some types possess a relative abundance of gold compared to other forms.The low gold pyrite influences the rate at which the concentrate can be processed by any particular route. If the different types of pyrite could be separated by flotation, then the gold grade of the final concentrate can be improved and the invisible gold could be recovered by downstream processing. This separation of low gold pyrite from the gold rich pyrite would increase the Au:S (gold:sulfur) ratio to the autoclave feed, thereby maximising the autoclave throughput and gold production per tonne.Different methods of extraction such as chemical oxidation, thermal oxidation and biological oxidation liberate gold from refractory ores. However, such oxidation methods have not been reported yet to be successful to allow separation of the low gold pyrite from the gold rich pyrite. This review is an evaluation of the separation processes of different sulfides available in the recent literature for refractory gold ores. All major pretreatment processes have been analysed and recommendations have been put forward for further research and development.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sulfide associated refractory gold ores hold a majority of the gold within the pyrite, which has several forms. The high proportion of the gold atomically dispersed in the pyrite has been confirmed by various mineralogy techniques such as optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and secondary ion mass spectrometry. There are different types of pyrite that exist within a refractory orebody. Some types possess a relative abundance of gold compared to other forms.The low gold pyrite influences the rate at which the concentrate can be processed by any particular route. If the different types of pyrite could be separated by flotation, then the gold grade of the final concentrate can be improved and the invisible gold could be recovered by downstream processing. This separation of low gold pyrite from the gold rich pyrite would increase the Au:S (gold:sulfur) ratio to the autoclave feed, thereby maximising the autoclave throughput and gold production per tonne.Different methods of extraction such as chemical oxidation, thermal oxidation and biological oxidation liberate gold from refractory ores. However, such oxidation methods have not been reported yet to be successful to allow separation of the low gold pyrite from the gold rich pyrite. This review is an evaluation of the separation processes of different sulfides available in the recent literature for refractory gold ores. All major pretreatment processes have been analysed and recommendations have been put forward for further research and development.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sulfide associated refractory gold ores hold a majority of the gold within the pyrite, which has several forms. The high proportion of the gold atomically dispersed in the pyrite has been confirmed by various mineralogy techniques such as optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and secondary ion mass spectrometry. There are different types of pyrite that exist within a refractory orebody. Some types possess a relative abundance of gold compared to other forms.The low gold pyrite influences the rate at which the concentrate can be processed by any particular route. If the different types of pyrite could be separated by flotation, then the gold grade of the final concentrate can be improved and the invisible gold could be recovered by downstream processing. This separation of low gold pyrite from the gold rich pyrite would increase the Au:S (gold:sulfur) ratio to the autoclave feed, thereby maximising the autoclave throughput and gold production per tonne.Different methods of extraction such as chemical oxidation, thermal oxidation and biological oxidation liberate gold from refractory ores. However, such oxidation methods have not been reported yet to be successful to allow separation of the low gold pyrite from the gold rich pyrite. This review is an evaluation of the separation processes of different sulfides available in the recent literature for refractory gold ores. All major pretreatment processes have been analysed and recommendations have been put forward for further research and development.

Key concepts: Pyrite, Autoclave, Sulfide, Gold extraction, Sulfur, Chemistry, Scanning electron microscope, Sulfide minerals

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A review of pretreatment methods to separate the different types of pyrites in gold processing — Research Paper | ScholarLens