2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluation of the quality factor of an electrically small antenna in spheroidal coordinates

Richard C. Adams, P. M. Hansen

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

A number of researchers have obtained expressions for the quality factor or "Q" of an antenna. Most of these authors treated the antenna as surrounded by a spherical surface. A spherical surface conforms to the geometry of very few antennas. Here we derive the corresponding expressions for the Q of an electrically small antenna surrounded by an spheroidal surface that is either prolate or oblate. In this way we can better treat the effects of aspect ratio. Prolate spheroids should better represent most antennas, which are long and thin. Oblate spheroids should represent antennas in the shape of a disk. We also present analytic expressions for the value of Q for spheroids in the limit of very small electrical length. The expressions become equal to that of the sphere in the appropriate limit. We explore some of the results from analytic expressions for prolate and oblate spheroids when compared to a sphere

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A number of researchers have obtained expressions for the quality factor or "Q" of an antenna. Most of these authors treated the antenna as surrounded by a spherical surface. A spherical surface conforms to the geometry of very few antennas. Here we derive the corresponding expressions for the Q of an electrically small antenna surrounded by an spheroidal surface that is either prolate or oblate. In this way we can better treat the effects of aspect ratio. Prolate spheroids should better represent most antennas, which are long and thin. Oblate spheroids should represent antennas in the shape of a disk. We also present analytic expressions for the value of Q for spheroids in the limit of very small electrical length. The expressions become equal to that of the sphere in the appropriate limit. We explore some of the results from analytic expressions for prolate and oblate spheroids when compared to a sphere

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A number of researchers have obtained expressions for the quality factor or "Q" of an antenna. Most of these authors treated the antenna as surrounded by a spherical surface. A spherical surface conforms to the geometry of very few antennas. Here we derive the corresponding expressions for the Q of an electrically small antenna surrounded by an spheroidal surface that is either prolate or oblate. In this way we can better treat the effects of aspect ratio. Prolate spheroids should better represent most antennas, which are long and thin. Oblate spheroids should represent antennas in the shape of a disk. We also present analytic expressions for the value of Q for spheroids in the limit of very small electrical length. The expressions become equal to that of the sphere in the appropriate limit. We explore some of the results from analytic expressions for prolate and oblate spheroids when compared to a sphere

Key concepts: Prolate spheroid, Prolate spheroidal coordinates, Oblate spheroid, Antenna (radio), Limit (mathematics), Spheroid, Physics, Quality (philosophy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of the quality factor of an electrically small antenna in spheroidal coordinates — Research Paper | ScholarLens