2007Journal of the Association for Information SystemsRequires access

An Assessment of Formative and Reflective Constructs in IS Research

Ronald Freeze, Robyn L. Raschke

Open publisher page 133 citations

Abstract

Construct development and the use of structural equation modeling has become an important aspect of IS research. However, a review of recent MIS Quarterly (MISQ) articles indicates that little attention is given during theoretical development as to the formative or reflective nature of these constructs. This lack of attention has three implication issues that involve 1) construct misspecification, 2) construct identification and 3) construct validation. This research provides a review of these issues in terms of the current recommendations for formative and reflective constructs and reviews the most recent MISQ articles in terms of their adherence to these recommendations. Guidelines for IS researchers to address construct development and aid in the determination of whether their constructs should be tested as formative or reflective variables are presented to enhance the transportability of constructs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Construct development and the use of structural equation modeling has become an important aspect of IS research. However, a review of recent MIS Quarterly (MISQ) articles indicates that little attention is given during theoretical development as to the formative or reflective nature of these constructs. This lack of attention has three implication issues that involve 1) construct misspecification, 2) construct identification and 3) construct validation. This research provides a review of these issues in terms of the current recommendations for formative and reflective constructs and reviews the most recent MISQ articles in terms of their adherence to these recommendations. Guidelines for IS researchers to address construct development and aid in the determination of whether their constructs should be tested as formative or reflective variables are presented to enhance the transportability of constructs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 133 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Construct development and the use of structural equation modeling has become an important aspect of IS research. However, a review of recent MIS Quarterly (MISQ) articles indicates that little attention is given during theoretical development as to the formative or reflective nature of these constructs. This lack of attention has three implication issues that involve 1) construct misspecification, 2) construct identification and 3) construct validation. This research provides a review of these issues in terms of the current recommendations for formative and reflective constructs and reviews the most recent MISQ articles in terms of their adherence to these recommendations. Guidelines for IS researchers to address construct development and aid in the determination of whether their constructs should be tested as formative or reflective variables are presented to enhance the transportability of constructs.

Key concepts: Formative assessment, Construct (python library), Identification (biology), Computer science, Construct validity, Psychology, Management science, Mathematics education

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Assessment of Formative and Reflective Constructs in IS Research — Research Paper | ScholarLens