Evaluation of five staging systems in 470 patients with multiple myeloma.
Dimitra Mihou, Irene Katodritou, Kostas Zervas
Abstract
Dimitra Mihou, Irene Katodritou, Kostas Zervas
Abstract
We evaluated the prognostic significance of five staging systems in 470 consecutive, previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma diagnosed between 1989 and 2006. The five staging systems were those proposed by Durie and Salmon, Bataille et al., the South West Oncology Group, Weber et al. and the International Staging System. This last proved to be superior to the others.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We evaluated the prognostic significance of five staging systems in 470 consecutive, previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma diagnosed between 1989 and 2006. The five staging systems were those proposed by Durie and Salmon, Bataille et al., the South West Oncology Group, Weber et al. and the International Staging System. This last proved to be superior to the others.
Key concepts: Staging system, Multiple myeloma, Medicine, Oncology, Internal medicine, Neoplasm staging, Cancer