2007Frontiers of Literary Studies in ChinaRequires access

Reflections on “literary awareness in Wei and Jin Dynasties”

Zhao Min-li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Literary awareness in the Wei and Jin Dynasties (Wei Chao 魏朝 CE 220–265; Jin Chao 晋朝 CE 265–420), as first proposed by Suzuki Torao, is not a “scientific” argument. From the relationships between “practicalism” and “literary awareness” as well as “individualism” and “lyric literature” in the Han (Han Chao 汉朝 BCE 206–CE 220) and Wei Dynasties, it can be seen that the fundamental drive of medieval literature was the social changes taking place during these dynasties, the emergence of the literati as a social stratum, and their attitude towards literature. The concept of “literary awareness in the Wei and Jin Dynasties” cannot describe the literary development in medieval China. As it misunderstands the essential characteristics in the development of Chinese literature, it should be discarded.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Literary awareness in the Wei and Jin Dynasties (Wei Chao 魏朝 CE 220–265; Jin Chao 晋朝 CE 265–420), as first proposed by Suzuki Torao, is not a “scientific” argument. From the relationships between “practicalism” and “literary awareness” as well as “individualism” and “lyric literature” in the Han (Han Chao 汉朝 BCE 206–CE 220) and Wei Dynasties, it can be seen that the fundamental drive of medieval literature was the social changes taking place during these dynasties, the emergence of the literati as a social stratum, and their attitude towards literature. The concept of “literary awareness in the Wei and Jin Dynasties” cannot describe the literary development in medieval China. As it misunderstands the essential characteristics in the development of Chinese literature, it should be discarded.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Literary awareness in the Wei and Jin Dynasties (Wei Chao 魏朝 CE 220–265; Jin Chao 晋朝 CE 265–420), as first proposed by Suzuki Torao, is not a “scientific” argument. From the relationships between “practicalism” and “literary awareness” as well as “individualism” and “lyric literature” in the Han (Han Chao 汉朝 BCE 206–CE 220) and Wei Dynasties, it can be seen that the fundamental drive of medieval literature was the social changes taking place during these dynasties, the emergence of the literati as a social stratum, and their attitude towards literature. The concept of “literary awareness in the Wei and Jin Dynasties” cannot describe the literary development in medieval China. As it misunderstands the essential characteristics in the development of Chinese literature, it should be discarded.

Key concepts: Stratum, Six Dynasties, China, Literature, History, Individualism, Argument (complex analysis), Literary criticism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reflections on “literary awareness in Wei and Jin Dynasties” — Research Paper | ScholarLens