2005•PubMedRequires access

Early experience with the Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital idiopathic clubfoot.

Eitan Segev, David Keret, Franklin Lokiec, Ariella Yavor, Shlomo Wientroub, Elias Ezra, Shlomo Hayek

Open publisher page 81 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The preferred conservative treatment for congenital idiopathic clubfoot deformity remains a controversial issue. OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of two groups of CICF patients who underwent two different treatment protocols. METHODS: The study cohort included 72 infants treated in our hospital from August 1998 to December 2002. Group 1 comprised 40 infants (61 clubfeet) who were treated by a traditional method (a modification of the Kite and Lovell technique), and group 2 consisted of 32 infants (48 clubfeet) treated with the Ponseti technique. Both groups were similar in age, gender and severity of the deformity (Dimeglio scoring system). RESULTS: After an average follow-up of 54.9 months (range 44-68), 35 (57%) clubfeet in group 1 required surgical intervention and 27 (44%) clubfeet had a residual deformity at last follow-up. In the Ponseti group, 45 (94%) clubfeet were fully corrected at last follow-up (average 29.2 months, range 16-45) while 3 (6%) clubfeet had residual deformity and required surgery. Achilles tendon tenotomy was performed with no complications in 47 clubfeet (in group 2) at an average age of 2.4 months (range 2-4 months). CONCLUSIONS: Even after a relatively short follow-up period, our success rate with the Ponseti approach already appears to be significantly higher and to bear fewer complications than the traditional treatment, in agreement with the results published by other medical centers. We now endorse the Ponseti technique of conservative manipulative treatment for congenital idiopathic clubfoot in our department.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The preferred conservative treatment for congenital idiopathic clubfoot deformity remains a controversial issue. OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of two groups of CICF patients who underwent two different treatment protocols. METHODS: The study cohort included 72 infants treated in our hospital from August 1998 to December 2002. Group 1 comprised 40 infants (61 clubfeet) who were treated by a traditional method (a modification of the Kite and Lovell technique), and group 2 consisted of 32 infants (48 clubfeet) treated with the Ponseti technique. Both groups were similar in age, gender and severity of the deformity (Dimeglio scoring system). RESULTS: After an average follow-up of 54.9 months (range 44-68), 35 (57%) clubfeet in group 1 required surgical intervention and 27 (44%) clubfeet had a residual deformity at last follow-up. In the Ponseti group, 45 (94%) clubfeet were fully corrected at last follow-up (average 29.2 months, range 16-45) while 3 (6%) clubfeet had residual deformity and required surgery. Achilles tendon tenotomy was performed with no complications in 47 clubfeet (in group 2) at an average age of 2.4 months (range 2-4 months). CONCLUSIONS: Even after a relatively short follow-up period, our success rate with the Ponseti approach already appears to be significantly higher and to bear fewer complications than the traditional treatment, in agreement with the results published by other medical centers. We now endorse the Ponseti technique of conservative manipulative treatment for congenital idiopathic clubfoot in our department.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 81 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The preferred conservative treatment for congenital idiopathic clubfoot deformity remains a controversial issue. OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of two groups of CICF patients who underwent two different treatment protocols. METHODS: The study cohort included 72 infants treated in our hospital from August 1998 to December 2002. Group 1 comprised 40 infants (61 clubfeet) who were treated by a traditional method (a modification of the Kite and Lovell technique), and group 2 consisted of 32 infants (48 clubfeet) treated with the Ponseti technique. Both groups were similar in age, gender and severity of the deformity (Dimeglio scoring system). RESULTS: After an average follow-up of 54.9 months (range 44-68), 35 (57%) clubfeet in group 1 required surgical intervention and 27 (44%) clubfeet had a residual deformity at last follow-up. In the Ponseti group, 45 (94%) clubfeet were fully corrected at last follow-up (average 29.2 months, range 16-45) while 3 (6%) clubfeet had residual deformity and required surgery. Achilles tendon tenotomy was performed with no complications in 47 clubfeet (in group 2) at an average age of 2.4 months (range 2-4 months). CONCLUSIONS: Even after a relatively short follow-up period, our success rate with the Ponseti approach already appears to be significantly higher and to bear fewer complications than the traditional treatment, in agreement with the results published by other medical centers. We now endorse the Ponseti technique of conservative manipulative treatment for congenital idiopathic clubfoot in our department.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ponseti method, Clubfoot, Tenotomy, Deformity, Surgery, Congenital talipes equinovarus, Achilles tendon

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Early experience with the Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital idiopathic clubfoot. — Research Paper | ScholarLens