1985•Brazilian Journal of GeologyOpen access

CRUSTAL EVOLUTION IN THE EARLY PRECAMBRIAN

Stephen Erwin Moorbath

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Recently published models present highly conflicting views of continental evolution. At one extreme, it is envisaged that continental crust was fully developed by ∼ 4000 Myr ago and quantitatively recycled through the mantle throughout geological time without net change of crustal mass (continental steady-state hypothesis). A fundamentally contrasted view is that the earliest continental crust (∼ 3700 Myr) occurred in small, localised patches, and that once juvenile continental crust is cratonised it cannot be returned to the mantle in bulk. This corresponds to the concept of irreversible chemical differentiation of the mantle with accompanying growth of continental crust through geological time (continental growth hypothesis). In between these extremes, it has been suggested that some relatively minor continental constituents may be selectively recycled into the mantle. This does not involve wholesale recycling of continental crust, and still allows continental growth. Whilst isotopic and trace element modelling imposes important constraints it is not absolutely definitive in deciding between contrasted evolutionary models. Additional criteria for continental evolution must be sought from assorted geological, geophysical, geochemical and geochronological data. As one example, it is important to determine the age and regional extent of exposed early Precambrian continental crust, and also whether exposed crust is underlain by significantly older crust at depth.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recently published models present highly conflicting views of continental evolution. At one extreme, it is envisaged that continental crust was fully developed by ∼ 4000 Myr ago and quantitatively recycled through the mantle throughout geological time without net change of crustal mass (continental steady-state hypothesis). A fundamentally contrasted view is that the earliest continental crust (∼ 3700 Myr) occurred in small, localised patches, and that once juvenile continental crust is cratonised it cannot be returned to the mantle in bulk. This corresponds to the concept of irreversible chemical differentiation of the mantle with accompanying growth of continental crust through geological time (continental growth hypothesis). In between these extremes, it has been suggested that some relatively minor continental constituents may be selectively recycled into the mantle. This does not involve wholesale recycling of continental crust, and still allows continental growth. Whilst isotopic and trace element modelling imposes important constraints it is not absolutely definitive in deciding between contrasted evolutionary models. Additional criteria for continental evolution must be sought from assorted geological, geophysical, geochemical and geochronological data. As one example, it is important to determine the age and regional extent of exposed early Precambrian continental crust, and also whether exposed crust is underlain by significantly older crust at depth.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recently published models present highly conflicting views of continental evolution. At one extreme, it is envisaged that continental crust was fully developed by ∼ 4000 Myr ago and quantitatively recycled through the mantle throughout geological time without net change of crustal mass (continental steady-state hypothesis). A fundamentally contrasted view is that the earliest continental crust (∼ 3700 Myr) occurred in small, localised patches, and that once juvenile continental crust is cratonised it cannot be returned to the mantle in bulk. This corresponds to the concept of irreversible chemical differentiation of the mantle with accompanying growth of continental crust through geological time (continental growth hypothesis). In between these extremes, it has been suggested that some relatively minor continental constituents may be selectively recycled into the mantle. This does not involve wholesale recycling of continental crust, and still allows continental growth. Whilst isotopic and trace element modelling imposes important constraints it is not absolutely definitive in deciding between contrasted evolutionary models. Additional criteria for continental evolution must be sought from assorted geological, geophysical, geochemical and geochronological data. As one example, it is important to determine the age and regional extent of exposed early Precambrian continental crust, and also whether exposed crust is underlain by significantly older crust at depth.

Key concepts: Continental crust, Geology, Crust, Precambrian, Continental margin, Mantle (geology), Earth science, Paleontology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CRUSTAL EVOLUTION IN THE EARLY PRECAMBRIAN — Research Paper | ScholarLens