1968Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)Open access

The littoral environment of rocky shores as a border between the sea and the land and between the sea and the fresh water

C. Den Hartog

Open full text 17 citations

Abstract

Many ecologists have occupied themselves with the problem of the littoral zonation and they still disagree among themselves about the delimitation of the zones and the factors which cause the zonation. In this paper the problem has been approached in two different ways. In the first place the littoral zone sensu lato has been regarded as the border area between the sea and the land. This approach does not result in an explanation of the ‘submergence’ of many eulittoral organisms in the Arctic waters and the Baltic. Secondly the littoral zone sensu lato has been considered as the border zone between the sea and the fresh water, in other words as a brackish environment. This approach gives a reasonable explanation for the ‘submergence’ of littoral organisms in low-salinity waters. It appears that both tidal movements and wave action (wash, splash, and spray) cause salinity fluctuations and that salinity is one of the major factors acting in the littoral zonation. Most of the organisms which do not show ‘submergence’ in low-salinity waters are restricted to the supralittoral and the upper part of the intertidal zone, where they are beyond the influence of the daily tidal rhythm. The vital factor for these organisms is contact with the air. The third active factor, light, is of some importance in the lower part of the eulittoral. These three abiotic factors, together with biological stress (competition), effectuate the littoral zonation pattern. Both the supralittoral and the eulittoral are well-defined ecological units, characterized by their own physical features and their own species composition. In fact they have almost no common species. Strong wave action allows some eulittoral species to survive in the supralittoral; this has to be regarded merely as an interference phenomenon.\nThe littoral border environment is in comparison with other brackish habitats extremely rich in species peculiar to it. In this environment the influence of the salt extends far above the tidal influence. In the estuarine environment, which has very few species exclusively bound to it, the reverse is the case. This could indicate that marine salt beyond the reach of the regular tidal rhythm creates conditions favourable for speciation.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Many ecologists have occupied themselves with the problem of the littoral zonation and they still disagree among themselves about the delimitation of the zones and the factors which cause the zonation. In this paper the problem has been approached in two different ways. In the first place the littoral zone sensu lato has been regarded as the border area between the sea and the land. This approach does not result in an explanation of the ‘submergence’ of many eulittoral organisms in the Arctic waters and the Baltic. Secondly the littoral zone sensu lato has been considered as the border zone between the sea and the fresh water, in other words as a brackish environment. This approach gives a reasonable explanation for the ‘submergence’ of littoral organisms in low-salinity waters. It appears that both tidal movements and wave action (wash, splash, and spray) cause salinity fluctuations and that salinity is one of the major factors acting in the littoral zonation. Most of the organisms which do not show ‘submergence’ in low-salinity waters are restricted to the supralittoral and the upper part of the intertidal zone, where they are beyond the influence of the daily tidal rhythm. The vital factor for these organisms is contact with the air. The third active factor, light, is of some importance in the lower part of the eulittoral. These three abiotic factors, together with biological stress (competition), effectuate the littoral zonation pattern. Both the supralittoral and the eulittoral are well-defined ecological units, characterized by their own physical features and their own species composition. In fact they have almost no common species. Strong wave action allows some eulittoral species to survive in the supralittoral; this has to be regarded merely as an interference phenomenon.\nThe littoral border environment is in comparison with other brackish habitats extremely rich in species peculiar to it. In this environment the influence of the salt extends far above the tidal influence. In the estuarine environment, which has very few species exclusively bound to it, the reverse is the case. This could indicate that marine salt beyond the reach of the regular tidal rhythm creates conditions favourable for speciation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Many ecologists have occupied themselves with the problem of the littoral zonation and they still disagree among themselves about the delimitation of the zones and the factors which cause the zonation. In this paper the problem has been approached in two different ways. In the first place the littoral zone sensu lato has been regarded as the border area between the sea and the land. This approach does not result in an explanation of the ‘submergence’ of many eulittoral organisms in the Arctic waters and the Baltic. Secondly the littoral zone sensu lato has been considered as the border zone between the sea and the fresh water, in other words as a brackish environment. This approach gives a reasonable explanation for the ‘submergence’ of littoral organisms in low-salinity waters. It appears that both tidal movements and wave action (wash, splash, and spray) cause salinity fluctuations and that salinity is one of the major factors acting in the littoral zonation. Most of the organisms which do not show ‘submergence’ in low-salinity waters are restricted to the supralittoral and the upper part of the intertidal zone, where they are beyond the influence of the daily tidal rhythm. The vital factor for these organisms is contact with the air. The third active factor, light, is of some importance in the lower part of the eulittoral. These three abiotic factors, together with biological stress (competition), effectuate the littoral zonation pattern. Both the supralittoral and the eulittoral are well-defined ecological units, characterized by their own physical features and their own species composition. In fact they have almost no common species. Strong wave action allows some eulittoral species to survive in the supralittoral; this has to be regarded merely as an interference phenomenon.\nThe littoral border environment is in comparison with other brackish habitats extremely rich in species peculiar to it. In this environment the influence of the salt extends far above the tidal influence. In the estuarine environment, which has very few species exclusively bound to it, the reverse is the case. This could indicate that marine salt beyond the reach of the regular tidal rhythm creates conditions favourable for speciation.

Key concepts: Supralittoral zone, Littoral zone, Intertidal zone, Brackish water, Ecology, Salinity, Intertidal ecology, Shore

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The littoral environment of rocky shores as a border between the sea and the land and between the sea and the fresh water — Research Paper | ScholarLens