2010•University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland)Open access

Identifying the issues of team project work for distance education students: a case study in civil engineering

Yan Zhuge, Julie E. Mills

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Project based learning has been introduced to a final year structural design course at the University of Southern Queensland (USQ) recently and one requirement associated with the project is teamwork. Unfortunately, teamwork is uncommon in the current engineering program at the USQ, mainly due to the fact that around 80% of its students are distance education students. When the design project was given to students at the beginning of the course, the idea of teamwork was welcome. Surprisingly, after the projects were submitted, it was found that most students chose to work individually. An evaluation was then conducted to explore why students chose not to work in teams, and particularly to determine the barriers that prevented it for distance education students. This paper will discuss the analysis of student feedback, compare the responses between distance education and on-campus students and explore potential means of overcoming these issues.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Project based learning has been introduced to a final year structural design course at the University of Southern Queensland (USQ) recently and one requirement associated with the project is teamwork. Unfortunately, teamwork is uncommon in the current engineering program at the USQ, mainly due to the fact that around 80% of its students are distance education students. When the design project was given to students at the beginning of the course, the idea of teamwork was welcome. Surprisingly, after the projects were submitted, it was found that most students chose to work individually. An evaluation was then conducted to explore why students chose not to work in teams, and particularly to determine the barriers that prevented it for distance education students. This paper will discuss the analysis of student feedback, compare the responses between distance education and on-campus students and explore potential means of overcoming these issues.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Project based learning has been introduced to a final year structural design course at the University of Southern Queensland (USQ) recently and one requirement associated with the project is teamwork. Unfortunately, teamwork is uncommon in the current engineering program at the USQ, mainly due to the fact that around 80% of its students are distance education students. When the design project was given to students at the beginning of the course, the idea of teamwork was welcome. Surprisingly, after the projects were submitted, it was found that most students chose to work individually. An evaluation was then conducted to explore why students chose not to work in teams, and particularly to determine the barriers that prevented it for distance education students. This paper will discuss the analysis of student feedback, compare the responses between distance education and on-campus students and explore potential means of overcoming these issues.

Key concepts: Teamwork, Work (physics), Chose, Distance education, Engineering education, Engineering, Pedagogy, Medical education

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Identifying the issues of team project work for distance education students: a case study in civil engineering — Research Paper | ScholarLens