2012DergiPark (Istanbul University)Open access

ANDRE LEFEVRE AND TRANSLATION AS A REWRITING PROCESS: THE CANONIZATION OF BERTOLT BRECHT IN THE ANGLO-SAXON WORLD

Burç İdem Dinçel

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Translation, probably one of the most complicated facts in human history, offers the very chance for individuals to build bridges between different cultures thanks to the messages, elements, literary and artistic components it conveys from one culture to another. In this respect, translation can be understood as a genuine form of cultural human action. However, this cultural aspect of translation has been neglected throughout the history of translation research due to the fact that translation has been treated as a sub-discipline of (applied) linguistics and literary studies by scholars. As a result, translation has been mainly concerned with questions, such as translatability, faithfulness, accuracy, and equivalence. Even though the questions mentioned above have an enormous importance within the boundaries of the field, the newly emerging discipline ought to have embraced the other aspects of translation which had been disregarded before. The decades of the 1970s and the 1980s have witnessed the untiring efforts of the development and birth of “Translation Studies” as an autonomous discipline. 1976 Leuven Colloquium on Literature and Translation brought theorists from Israel and the Low Countries together and allowed these scholars the opportunity to share their studies with the other experts of translation. The proceeding research which has been carried out in the subsequent years after the Leuven conference played a vital role in the evolution of Translation Studies as an autonomous discipline. The Leuven seminar not only paved the way for the emergence of the discipline, but also strengthened the idea of translation as a crucial element of interaction between cultures in the decade of the 1970s. One of the most important contributions to this seminar was the participation of the Israeli scholar Itamar Even-Zohar with a paper entitled Translated Literature within the Literary Polysystem which has launched new debates within the realm of the recently evolving field. In addition to the discussions the study has set forth, the concept of (poly)systems theory has become the focus of attention. In the light of the opinions suggested by Itamar Even-Zohar and other scholars during the Leuven seminar, new approaches have been developed by translation theorists such as, Gideon Toury, Theo

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Translation, probably one of the most complicated facts in human history, offers the very chance for individuals to build bridges between different cultures thanks to the messages, elements, literary and artistic components it conveys from one culture to another. In this respect, translation can be understood as a genuine form of cultural human action. However, this cultural aspect of translation has been neglected throughout the history of translation research due to the fact that translation has been treated as a sub-discipline of (applied) linguistics and literary studies by scholars. As a result, translation has been mainly concerned with questions, such as translatability, faithfulness, accuracy, and equivalence. Even though the questions mentioned above have an enormous importance within the boundaries of the field, the newly emerging discipline ought to have embraced the other aspects of translation which had been disregarded before. The decades of the 1970s and the 1980s have witnessed the untiring efforts of the development and birth of “Translation Studies” as an autonomous discipline. 1976 Leuven Colloquium on Literature and Translation brought theorists from Israel and the Low Countries together and allowed these scholars the opportunity to share their studies with the other experts of translation. The proceeding research which has been carried out in the subsequent years after the Leuven conference played a vital role in the evolution of Translation Studies as an autonomous discipline. The Leuven seminar not only paved the way for the emergence of the discipline, but also strengthened the idea of translation as a crucial element of interaction between cultures in the decade of the 1970s. One of the most important contributions to this seminar was the participation of the Israeli scholar Itamar Even-Zohar with a paper entitled Translated Literature within the Literary Polysystem which has launched new debates within the realm of the recently evolving field. In addition to the discussions the study has set forth, the concept of (poly)systems theory has become the focus of attention. In the light of the opinions suggested by Itamar Even-Zohar and other scholars during the Leuven seminar, new approaches have been developed by translation theorists such as, Gideon Toury, Theo

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Translation, probably one of the most complicated facts in human history, offers the very chance for individuals to build bridges between different cultures thanks to the messages, elements, literary and artistic components it conveys from one culture to another. In this respect, translation can be understood as a genuine form of cultural human action. However, this cultural aspect of translation has been neglected throughout the history of translation research due to the fact that translation has been treated as a sub-discipline of (applied) linguistics and literary studies by scholars. As a result, translation has been mainly concerned with questions, such as translatability, faithfulness, accuracy, and equivalence. Even though the questions mentioned above have an enormous importance within the boundaries of the field, the newly emerging discipline ought to have embraced the other aspects of translation which had been disregarded before. The decades of the 1970s and the 1980s have witnessed the untiring efforts of the development and birth of “Translation Studies” as an autonomous discipline. 1976 Leuven Colloquium on Literature and Translation brought theorists from Israel and the Low Countries together and allowed these scholars the opportunity to share their studies with the other experts of translation. The proceeding research which has been carried out in the subsequent years after the Leuven conference played a vital role in the evolution of Translation Studies as an autonomous discipline. The Leuven seminar not only paved the way for the emergence of the discipline, but also strengthened the idea of translation as a crucial element of interaction between cultures in the decade of the 1970s. One of the most important contributions to this seminar was the participation of the Israeli scholar Itamar Even-Zohar with a paper entitled Translated Literature within the Literary Polysystem which has launched new debates within the realm of the recently evolving field. In addition to the discussions the study has set forth, the concept of (poly)systems theory has become the focus of attention. In the light of the opinions suggested by Itamar Even-Zohar and other scholars during the Leuven seminar, new approaches have been developed by translation theorists such as, Gideon Toury, Theo

Key concepts: Translation studies, Equivalence (formal languages), Rewriting, Sociology, Epistemology, Linguistics, History, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ANDRE LEFEVRE AND TRANSLATION AS A REWRITING PROCESS: THE CANONIZATION OF BERTOLT BRECHT IN THE ANGLO-SAXON WORLD — Research Paper | ScholarLens