2012Lund University Publications Student Papers (Lund University)Open access

Mandating For Peace - An analysis of two UN peacebuilding mandates through a critical approach

Linnea Malmström

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This essay examines the nature of contemporary UN peacebuilding mandates and the critique aimed at incorporating Western liberal ideas in postconflict peacebuilding missions. A critical discussion is provided to highlight the problems inherited in promoting liberal peacebuilding in peace operations, followed by an analysis and comparison of the mandates for UNAMSIL and UNMIS through an analytical framework of peacebuilding operations. The purpose is to assess if liberal peacebuilding strategies still are used in recent UN peacebuilding mandates, despite the critique raised against it. The study discovers that liberal peacebuilding still is visible in mandates issued for peace operations today, but appears to have greater recognition of some of the critique that is debated.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This essay examines the nature of contemporary UN peacebuilding mandates and the critique aimed at incorporating Western liberal ideas in postconflict peacebuilding missions. A critical discussion is provided to highlight the problems inherited in promoting liberal peacebuilding in peace operations, followed by an analysis and comparison of the mandates for UNAMSIL and UNMIS through an analytical framework of peacebuilding operations. The purpose is to assess if liberal peacebuilding strategies still are used in recent UN peacebuilding mandates, despite the critique raised against it. The study discovers that liberal peacebuilding still is visible in mandates issued for peace operations today, but appears to have greater recognition of some of the critique that is debated.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This essay examines the nature of contemporary UN peacebuilding mandates and the critique aimed at incorporating Western liberal ideas in postconflict peacebuilding missions. A critical discussion is provided to highlight the problems inherited in promoting liberal peacebuilding in peace operations, followed by an analysis and comparison of the mandates for UNAMSIL and UNMIS through an analytical framework of peacebuilding operations. The purpose is to assess if liberal peacebuilding strategies still are used in recent UN peacebuilding mandates, despite the critique raised against it. The study discovers that liberal peacebuilding still is visible in mandates issued for peace operations today, but appears to have greater recognition of some of the critique that is debated.

Key concepts: Peacebuilding, Political science, Public administration, Sociology, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mandating For Peace - An analysis of two UN peacebuilding mandates through a critical approach — Research Paper | ScholarLens