1987Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparison of Petrographic Characteristics of Selected Carbonate Rocks to their Petrophysical Log Response--Smackover Formation (Upper Jurassic)

Alfred A. Biehle, Carey M. Crocker

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent advancements in well logging techniques have enabled geologists to greatly increase their knowledge of petrophysical properties. Optimum use of porosity logs allows for predictions of porosity parameters other than merely the porosity percent Shallow water carbonate rocks contain a wide variety of porosity types and present a special problem to the geologist involved in subsurface work. The oolitic grainstone upper member of the Smackover Formation (Upper Jurassic), within the Gulf Coast region, contains numerous porosity types. Three major types, interparticle; intercrystalline, and oomoldic, were identified from petrographic analysis. With the use of computer generated crossplots of Neutron log values versus Density log values, it is possible to determine the amount of porosity types within a carbonate rock. The cementation exponent (m) from Archie's equation, as determined from Pickett Plots, is a reliable indicator of the tortuosity and permeability of carbonate units, while multivariate cluster analysis grouped porosities solely by percent porosity and not by porosity type.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT Recent advancements in well logging techniques have enabled geologists to greatly increase their knowledge of petrophysical properties. Optimum use of porosity logs allows for predictions of porosity parameters other than merely the porosity percent Shallow water carbonate rocks contain a wide variety of porosity types and present a special problem to the geologist involved in subsurface work. The oolitic grainstone upper member of the Smackover Formation (Upper Jurassic), within the Gulf Coast region, contains numerous porosity types. Three major types, interparticle; intercrystalline, and oomoldic, were identified from petrographic analysis. With the use of computer generated crossplots of Neutron log values versus Density log values, it is possible to determine the amount of porosity types within a carbonate rock. The cementation exponent (m) from Archie's equation, as determined from Pickett Plots, is a reliable indicator of the tortuosity and permeability of carbonate units, while multivariate cluster analysis grouped porosities solely by percent porosity and not by porosity type.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT Recent advancements in well logging techniques have enabled geologists to greatly increase their knowledge of petrophysical properties. Optimum use of porosity logs allows for predictions of porosity parameters other than merely the porosity percent Shallow water carbonate rocks contain a wide variety of porosity types and present a special problem to the geologist involved in subsurface work. The oolitic grainstone upper member of the Smackover Formation (Upper Jurassic), within the Gulf Coast region, contains numerous porosity types. Three major types, interparticle; intercrystalline, and oomoldic, were identified from petrographic analysis. With the use of computer generated crossplots of Neutron log values versus Density log values, it is possible to determine the amount of porosity types within a carbonate rock. The cementation exponent (m) from Archie's equation, as determined from Pickett Plots, is a reliable indicator of the tortuosity and permeability of carbonate units, while multivariate cluster analysis grouped porosities solely by percent porosity and not by porosity type.

Key concepts: Petrophysics, Grainstone, Petrography, Geology, Porosity, Carbonate, Carbonate rock, Lithology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Petrographic Characteristics of Selected Carbonate Rocks to their Petrophysical Log Response--Smackover Formation (Upper Jurassic) — Research Paper | ScholarLens