2001Respiratory CareRequires access

Patient-Ventilator Interactions during Volume-Support Ventilation: Asynchrony and Tidal Volume Instability-A Report of Three Cases

T Sottiaux

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

During pressure-support ventilation, tidal volume (V T ) can vary according to the level of the patient's respiratory effort and modifications of the thoraco-pulmonary mechanics. To keep V T as constant as possible, the Siemens Servo 300 ventilator proposes an original modification of pressure-support ven-tilation, called volume-support ventilation (VSV). VSV is a pressure-limited mode of ventilation that uses V T as a feedback control: the pressure support level is continuously adjusted to deliver a preset V T . Thus, the ventilator adapts the inspiratory pressure level, breath by breath, to changes in the patient's inspiratory effort and the mechanical thoraco-pulmonary properties. The clinician sets V T and respi-ratory frequency, and the ventilator calculates a preset minute volume. It has been shown that ineffec-tive respiratory efforts can occur during pressure-support ventilation. A mismatch between the neural (ie, patient) and mechanical (ie, ventilator) timings is the main cause of missing breaths occurring while the ventilator is in the inspiratory phase: the reason is that the ventilator does not cycle from inspiration to expiration until the inspiratory flow decreases to a threshold value (5% of the peak inspiratory flow). The patient's ineffective efforts can also occur during the expiratory phase of the ventilator: in that situation, the inspiratory effort occurs before complete lung emptying and is not high enough to trigger the ventilator. The risk of the patient making ineffective efforts is increased by the algorithm included in the VSV mode. If the patient makes numerous ineffective efforts, the frequency of effective efforts (recorded by the ventilator) can be lower than the set frequency, in which case a new target V T is calculated by the ventilator to achieve the preset minute volume. As V T increases, the mismatch between the neural and mechanical timings also increases. I report 3 clinical observations showing numerous patient respiratory efforts not sensed by the ventilator and inducing V T instability during VSV. These ineffective efforts can occur during inspiratory and expiratory phases. The mechanisms are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

During pressure-support ventilation, tidal volume (V T ) can vary according to the level of the patient's respiratory effort and modifications of the thoraco-pulmonary mechanics. To keep V T as constant as possible, the Siemens Servo 300 ventilator proposes an original modification of pressure-support ven-tilation, called volume-support ventilation (VSV). VSV is a pressure-limited mode of ventilation that uses V T as a feedback control: the pressure support level is continuously adjusted to deliver a preset V T . Thus, the ventilator adapts the inspiratory pressure level, breath by breath, to changes in the patient's inspiratory effort and the mechanical thoraco-pulmonary properties. The clinician sets V T and respi-ratory frequency, and the ventilator calculates a preset minute volume. It has been shown that ineffec-tive respiratory efforts can occur during pressure-support ventilation. A mismatch between the neural (ie, patient) and mechanical (ie, ventilator) timings is the main cause of missing breaths occurring while the ventilator is in the inspiratory phase: the reason is that the ventilator does not cycle from inspiration to expiration until the inspiratory flow decreases to a threshold value (5% of the peak inspiratory flow). The patient's ineffective efforts can also occur during the expiratory phase of the ventilator: in that situation, the inspiratory effort occurs before complete lung emptying and is not high enough to trigger the ventilator. The risk of the patient making ineffective efforts is increased by the algorithm included in the VSV mode. If the patient makes numerous ineffective efforts, the frequency of effective efforts (recorded by the ventilator) can be lower than the set frequency, in which case a new target V T is calculated by the ventilator to achieve the preset minute volume. As V T increases, the mismatch between the neural and mechanical timings also increases. I report 3 clinical observations showing numerous patient respiratory efforts not sensed by the ventilator and inducing V T instability during VSV. These ineffective efforts can occur during inspiratory and expiratory phases. The mechanisms are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

During pressure-support ventilation, tidal volume (V T ) can vary according to the level of the patient's respiratory effort and modifications of the thoraco-pulmonary mechanics. To keep V T as constant as possible, the Siemens Servo 300 ventilator proposes an original modification of pressure-support ven-tilation, called volume-support ventilation (VSV). VSV is a pressure-limited mode of ventilation that uses V T as a feedback control: the pressure support level is continuously adjusted to deliver a preset V T . Thus, the ventilator adapts the inspiratory pressure level, breath by breath, to changes in the patient's inspiratory effort and the mechanical thoraco-pulmonary properties. The clinician sets V T and respi-ratory frequency, and the ventilator calculates a preset minute volume. It has been shown that ineffec-tive respiratory efforts can occur during pressure-support ventilation. A mismatch between the neural (ie, patient) and mechanical (ie, ventilator) timings is the main cause of missing breaths occurring while the ventilator is in the inspiratory phase: the reason is that the ventilator does not cycle from inspiration to expiration until the inspiratory flow decreases to a threshold value (5% of the peak inspiratory flow). The patient's ineffective efforts can also occur during the expiratory phase of the ventilator: in that situation, the inspiratory effort occurs before complete lung emptying and is not high enough to trigger the ventilator. The risk of the patient making ineffective efforts is increased by the algorithm included in the VSV mode. If the patient makes numerous ineffective efforts, the frequency of effective efforts (recorded by the ventilator) can be lower than the set frequency, in which case a new target V T is calculated by the ventilator to achieve the preset minute volume. As V T increases, the mismatch between the neural and mechanical timings also increases. I report 3 clinical observations showing numerous patient respiratory efforts not sensed by the ventilator and inducing V T instability during VSV. These ineffective efforts can occur during inspiratory and expiratory phases. The mechanisms are discussed.

Key concepts: Medicine, Tidal volume, Pressure support ventilation, Ventilation (architecture), Respiratory minute volume, Volume (thermodynamics), Anesthesia, Mechanical ventilation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Patient-Ventilator Interactions during Volume-Support Ventilation: Asynchrony and Tidal Volume Instability-A Report of Three Cases — Research Paper | ScholarLens