When is a mechanical control system kinematic?
Andrew D. Lewis
Abstract
Andrew D. Lewis
Abstract
The author deals with simple mechanical control systems (A.D. Lewis and R.M. Murray, 1997), possibly with constraints (A.D. Lewis, 1997). These systems are naturally characterised by having forces as inputs. However, in the current literature there is a tendency to replace force inputs with velocity inputs. This is sometimes a justifiable step, and serves to simplify somewhat certain applications. However, one must be careful as: (1) sometimes, very often in fact, this simplification is comprehensively not possible (as we demonstrate); and (2) the two different control problems which result, one with force inputs and one with velocity inputs, will never be equivalent with the same class of inputs (unless one makes the impractical restriction of smooth inputs). Nevertheless, if one properly considers the classes of inputs for both problems, it is possible to give a simple, computationally tractable condition which determines when a system with force inputs can be reduced to one with velocity inputs. One of the main points made is that there is no correspondence, be it complete or approximate, between mechanical control systems, and so-called "nonholonomic" (i.e., driftless) control systems. A precise connection is made between those mechanical systems which are dynamic (i.e., have forces as inputs) and those which are kinematic (i.e., have velocities as inputs).
OpenAlex reports 55 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The author deals with simple mechanical control systems (A.D. Lewis and R.M. Murray, 1997), possibly with constraints (A.D. Lewis, 1997). These systems are naturally characterised by having forces as inputs. However, in the current literature there is a tendency to replace force inputs with velocity inputs. This is sometimes a justifiable step, and serves to simplify somewhat certain applications. However, one must be careful as: (1) sometimes, very often in fact, this simplification is comprehensively not possible (as we demonstrate); and (2) the two different control problems which result, one with force inputs and one with velocity inputs, will never be equivalent with the same class of inputs (unless one makes the impractical restriction of smooth inputs). Nevertheless, if one properly considers the classes of inputs for both problems, it is possible to give a simple, computationally tractable condition which determines when a system with force inputs can be reduced to one with velocity inputs. One of the main points made is that there is no correspondence, be it complete or approximate, between mechanical control systems, and so-called "nonholonomic" (i.e., driftless) control systems. A precise connection is made between those mechanical systems which are dynamic (i.e., have forces as inputs) and those which are kinematic (i.e., have velocities as inputs).
Key concepts: Kinematics, Mechanical system, Simple (philosophy), Control theory (sociology), Nonholonomic system, Computer science, Class (philosophy), Control system