1996PubMedRequires access

Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

Dagoberto I. Gonzalez, Enrique Hernández, Lyndal Anderson, Paul B. Heller, Barbara Atkinson

Open publisher page 27 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define the clinical significance of qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) as favoring either a reactive process or a low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) in an effort to provide management guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 118 consecutive nonpregnant women with a cytological diagnosis of ASCUS favoring either a reactive process or LSIL were evaluated in our colposcopy clinic by repeat cervical cytologic smear, colposcopy and colposcopically directed biopsies and/or endocervical curettage, as indicated. RESULTS: Of the 58 patients evaluated for a smear of ASCUS, favoring a reactive process, 5 (8.6%) had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) CIN 1 documented by biopsy. None had a high grade lesion. Twenty-six (45%) of the 58 patients who had a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS favoring a reactive process had a repeat smear that was normal. None was found to have CIN. Of the 60 patients who had a cervical diagnosis of ASCUS favoring LSIL, 9 (15%) had CIN 1 or CIN 2. Nineteen (32%) of the 60 patients who had a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS favoring LSIL had a repeat smear that was normal. One of these patients had CIN 1 on biopsy. The sensitivity of a repeat smear, in this limited series, after an initial smear of ASCUS favoring a reactive process is 100%, while it was 66% after an initial smear of ASCUS favoring LSIL. CONCLUSION: This study showed that in our laboratory a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS favoring either a reactive process or LSIL is associated with a very low risk that the patient is haboring CIN. In the patient whose initial smear shows ASCUS favoring a reactive process, a repeat smear that is normal is reassuring. The patient whose smear shows ASCUS favoring LSIL probably requires further evaluation even in the presence of a normal repeat smear.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To define the clinical significance of qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) as favoring either a reactive process or a low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) in an effort to provide management guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 118 consecutive nonpregnant women with a cytological diagnosis of ASCUS favoring either a reactive process or LSIL were evaluated in our colposcopy clinic by repeat cervical cytologic smear, colposcopy and colposcopically directed biopsies and/or endocervical curettage, as indicated. RESULTS: Of the 58 patients evaluated for a smear of ASCUS, favoring a reactive process, 5 (8.6%) had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) CIN 1 documented by biopsy. None had a high grade lesion. Twenty-six (45%) of the 58 patients who had a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS favoring a reactive process had a repeat smear that was normal. None was found to have CIN. Of the 60 patients who had a cervical diagnosis of ASCUS favoring LSIL, 9 (15%) had CIN 1 or CIN 2. Nineteen (32%) of the 60 patients who had a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS favoring LSIL had a repeat smear that was normal. One of these patients had CIN 1 on biopsy. The sensitivity of a repeat smear, in this limited series, after an initial smear of ASCUS favoring a reactive process is 100%, while it was 66% after an initial smear of ASCUS favoring LSIL. CONCLUSION: This study showed that in our laboratory a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS favoring either a reactive process or LSIL is associated with a very low risk that the patient is haboring CIN. In the patient whose initial smear shows ASCUS favoring a reactive process, a repeat smear that is normal is reassuring. The patient whose smear shows ASCUS favoring LSIL probably requires further evaluation even in the presence of a normal repeat smear.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define the clinical significance of qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) as favoring either a reactive process or a low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) in an effort to provide management guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 118 consecutive nonpregnant women with a cytological diagnosis of ASCUS favoring either a reactive process or LSIL were evaluated in our colposcopy clinic by repeat cervical cytologic smear, colposcopy and colposcopically directed biopsies and/or endocervical curettage, as indicated. RESULTS: Of the 58 patients evaluated for a smear of ASCUS, favoring a reactive process, 5 (8.6%) had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) CIN 1 documented by biopsy. None had a high grade lesion. Twenty-six (45%) of the 58 patients who had a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS favoring a reactive process had a repeat smear that was normal. None was found to have CIN. Of the 60 patients who had a cervical diagnosis of ASCUS favoring LSIL, 9 (15%) had CIN 1 or CIN 2. Nineteen (32%) of the 60 patients who had a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS favoring LSIL had a repeat smear that was normal. One of these patients had CIN 1 on biopsy. The sensitivity of a repeat smear, in this limited series, after an initial smear of ASCUS favoring a reactive process is 100%, while it was 66% after an initial smear of ASCUS favoring LSIL. CONCLUSION: This study showed that in our laboratory a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS favoring either a reactive process or LSIL is associated with a very low risk that the patient is haboring CIN. In the patient whose initial smear shows ASCUS favoring a reactive process, a repeat smear that is normal is reassuring. The patient whose smear shows ASCUS favoring LSIL probably requires further evaluation even in the presence of a normal repeat smear.

Key concepts: Ascus (bryozoa), Colposcopy, Medicine, Squamous intraepithelial lesion, Endocervical curettage, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Biopsy, Cytology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. — Research Paper | ScholarLens