2015PubMedRequires access

Treatment of large diaphyseal bone defect of the tibia by the "fibula pro tibia" technique: application in developing countries.

René Castro Gayito, Giambattista Priuli, Sidi Yaya Traoré, Olivier Barbier, Pierre‐Louis Docquier

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Large segmental bone defects of the tibia may be due to infections, high-energy fractures, congenital diseases or tumors and represent a challenge for both the physician and the patient. In developing countries, the use of expansive techniques is not possible so that amputation is sometimes proposed. However, an alternative technique for limb salvage, applicable in developing countries consists of tibialization of the ipsilateral fibula. This technique is also called "Fibula pro Tibia", fibular transfer to the tibia or fibular centralization. We report this transfer in 4 patients with an average defect length of 11.8 cm. Union between the transferred fibula and the tibia was obtained in all patients, for both proximal and distal junctions, after an average time of 8.5 months (range, 4 to 18 months). Three patients returned to a normal walking function while one was still limping, but was able to walk independently without need of crutches.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Large segmental bone defects of the tibia may be due to infections, high-energy fractures, congenital diseases or tumors and represent a challenge for both the physician and the patient. In developing countries, the use of expansive techniques is not possible so that amputation is sometimes proposed. However, an alternative technique for limb salvage, applicable in developing countries consists of tibialization of the ipsilateral fibula. This technique is also called "Fibula pro Tibia", fibular transfer to the tibia or fibular centralization. We report this transfer in 4 patients with an average defect length of 11.8 cm. Union between the transferred fibula and the tibia was obtained in all patients, for both proximal and distal junctions, after an average time of 8.5 months (range, 4 to 18 months). Three patients returned to a normal walking function while one was still limping, but was able to walk independently without need of crutches.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Large segmental bone defects of the tibia may be due to infections, high-energy fractures, congenital diseases or tumors and represent a challenge for both the physician and the patient. In developing countries, the use of expansive techniques is not possible so that amputation is sometimes proposed. However, an alternative technique for limb salvage, applicable in developing countries consists of tibialization of the ipsilateral fibula. This technique is also called "Fibula pro Tibia", fibular transfer to the tibia or fibular centralization. We report this transfer in 4 patients with an average defect length of 11.8 cm. Union between the transferred fibula and the tibia was obtained in all patients, for both proximal and distal junctions, after an average time of 8.5 months (range, 4 to 18 months). Three patients returned to a normal walking function while one was still limping, but was able to walk independently without need of crutches.

Key concepts: Fibula, Tibia, Medicine, Expansive, Amputation, Surgery, Composite material, Compressive strength

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Treatment of large diaphyseal bone defect of the tibia by the "fibula pro tibia" technique: application in developing countries. — Research Paper | ScholarLens