1998PubMedRequires access

[Blood pressure measurements using three different cuff sizes].

Rolf Franck Berntsen, O Rømo, Erik Waage Nielsen

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The use of blood pressure cuffs containing bladders of appropriate size for the arm is a known prerequisite for correct blood pressure measurements. The Tricuff, containing three inflatable bladders of varying dimensions, one of which is automatically selected to fit the arm circumference, was compared to a standard cuff (12 x 35 cm) in 137 persons. In persons with large arms (circumference > or = 32 cm) measurement with the Tricuff showed on average 19.2 mm Hg lower systolic pressure and 12.9 mm Hg lower diastolic pressure than with the standard cuff. In persons with small arms (< 32 cm) the corresponding differences were 9.0 mm Hg and 7.5 mm Hg. Compared to the Tricuff, the standard cuff overestimates blood pressure in people with a large arm circumference. Overestimation may also be caused by the rubber bladder bulging more from below the standard soft nylon cuff than what the firmer texture of the Tricuff allows, resulting in falsely high values even in persons with normal arm circumference.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The use of blood pressure cuffs containing bladders of appropriate size for the arm is a known prerequisite for correct blood pressure measurements. The Tricuff, containing three inflatable bladders of varying dimensions, one of which is automatically selected to fit the arm circumference, was compared to a standard cuff (12 x 35 cm) in 137 persons. In persons with large arms (circumference > or = 32 cm) measurement with the Tricuff showed on average 19.2 mm Hg lower systolic pressure and 12.9 mm Hg lower diastolic pressure than with the standard cuff. In persons with small arms (< 32 cm) the corresponding differences were 9.0 mm Hg and 7.5 mm Hg. Compared to the Tricuff, the standard cuff overestimates blood pressure in people with a large arm circumference. Overestimation may also be caused by the rubber bladder bulging more from below the standard soft nylon cuff than what the firmer texture of the Tricuff allows, resulting in falsely high values even in persons with normal arm circumference.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The use of blood pressure cuffs containing bladders of appropriate size for the arm is a known prerequisite for correct blood pressure measurements. The Tricuff, containing three inflatable bladders of varying dimensions, one of which is automatically selected to fit the arm circumference, was compared to a standard cuff (12 x 35 cm) in 137 persons. In persons with large arms (circumference > or = 32 cm) measurement with the Tricuff showed on average 19.2 mm Hg lower systolic pressure and 12.9 mm Hg lower diastolic pressure than with the standard cuff. In persons with small arms (< 32 cm) the corresponding differences were 9.0 mm Hg and 7.5 mm Hg. Compared to the Tricuff, the standard cuff overestimates blood pressure in people with a large arm circumference. Overestimation may also be caused by the rubber bladder bulging more from below the standard soft nylon cuff than what the firmer texture of the Tricuff allows, resulting in falsely high values even in persons with normal arm circumference.

Key concepts: Cuff, Circumference, Inflatable, Blood pressure, Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Blood pressure measurements using three different cuff sizes]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens