2010•The Philippine Review of EconomicsRequires access

Returns to education in the Philippine

Hope A. Gerochi

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The paper estimated the marginal private and social rates of return for education investments over time (1988, 1990, and 1995) using the “elaborate method” and Mincer equation. Rates of return estimates in general were relatively stable, mostly increasing between 1988 and 1990, but fell in 1995. The unlikely trend of high or stable returns when educational attainment was increasing suggests that demand for educated workers somewhat kept pace with supply, due perhaps to technological expansion which favors skilled workers. Private and social rates of return consistently exceeded benchmarks used to judge the profitability of investment except for dropouts, possibly indicating the “sheepskin” effects and validating the private incentive for completion. As non-completion can be involuntary, government intervention is necessary—it should provide financial support to poor families to keep their children in school or implement policies to reduce unnecessary attrition in schooling attendance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper estimated the marginal private and social rates of return for education investments over time (1988, 1990, and 1995) using the “elaborate method” and Mincer equation. Rates of return estimates in general were relatively stable, mostly increasing between 1988 and 1990, but fell in 1995. The unlikely trend of high or stable returns when educational attainment was increasing suggests that demand for educated workers somewhat kept pace with supply, due perhaps to technological expansion which favors skilled workers. Private and social rates of return consistently exceeded benchmarks used to judge the profitability of investment except for dropouts, possibly indicating the “sheepskin” effects and validating the private incentive for completion. As non-completion can be involuntary, government intervention is necessary—it should provide financial support to poor families to keep their children in school or implement policies to reduce unnecessary attrition in schooling attendance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper estimated the marginal private and social rates of return for education investments over time (1988, 1990, and 1995) using the “elaborate method” and Mincer equation. Rates of return estimates in general were relatively stable, mostly increasing between 1988 and 1990, but fell in 1995. The unlikely trend of high or stable returns when educational attainment was increasing suggests that demand for educated workers somewhat kept pace with supply, due perhaps to technological expansion which favors skilled workers. Private and social rates of return consistently exceeded benchmarks used to judge the profitability of investment except for dropouts, possibly indicating the “sheepskin” effects and validating the private incentive for completion. As non-completion can be involuntary, government intervention is necessary—it should provide financial support to poor families to keep their children in school or implement policies to reduce unnecessary attrition in schooling attendance.

Key concepts: Rate of return, Attrition, Economics, Pace, Incentive, Investment (military), Profitability index, Government (linguistics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Returns to education in the Philippine — Research Paper | ScholarLens