2013•UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam)Open access

A populist Zeitgeist? The impact of populism on parties, media and the public in Western Europe

Matthijs Rooduijn

Open full text 30 citations

Abstract

Various scholars have claimed that populism has become mainstream in Western Europe, and that we are therefore witnessing a populist ‘Zeitgeist’ in this part of the world. This dissertation puts this claim to the test. Have political parties, media and citizens indeed become increasingly populist and dissatisfied with politics? The findings are mixed. Although media have become increasingly populist and the message of populist parties has fueled political dissatisfaction among voters, mainstream parties have not become more populist over the years. Moreover, populist parties themselves have even become less populist after their initial successes. This indicates that, despite the large impact of populist parties on Western European societies, populism is not pervasive to the extent that we can speak of an all-encompassing populist Zeitgeist.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Various scholars have claimed that populism has become mainstream in Western Europe, and that we are therefore witnessing a populist ‘Zeitgeist’ in this part of the world. This dissertation puts this claim to the test. Have political parties, media and citizens indeed become increasingly populist and dissatisfied with politics? The findings are mixed. Although media have become increasingly populist and the message of populist parties has fueled political dissatisfaction among voters, mainstream parties have not become more populist over the years. Moreover, populist parties themselves have even become less populist after their initial successes. This indicates that, despite the large impact of populist parties on Western European societies, populism is not pervasive to the extent that we can speak of an all-encompassing populist Zeitgeist.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Various scholars have claimed that populism has become mainstream in Western Europe, and that we are therefore witnessing a populist ‘Zeitgeist’ in this part of the world. This dissertation puts this claim to the test. Have political parties, media and citizens indeed become increasingly populist and dissatisfied with politics? The findings are mixed. Although media have become increasingly populist and the message of populist parties has fueled political dissatisfaction among voters, mainstream parties have not become more populist over the years. Moreover, populist parties themselves have even become less populist after their initial successes. This indicates that, despite the large impact of populist parties on Western European societies, populism is not pervasive to the extent that we can speak of an all-encompassing populist Zeitgeist.

Key concepts: Populism, Zeitgeist, Mainstream, Politics, Political science, Political economy, Western europe, Media studies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A populist Zeitgeist? The impact of populism on parties, media and the public in Western Europe — Research Paper | ScholarLens