2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Assumed and effective priors in Bayesian MAP estimation

Mila Nikolova

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Bayesian maximum a posteriori estimation (MAP) is a very popular way to recover unknown signals and images by using jointly observed data and priors formulated as a probability law. In a variational context, a MAP estimate minimizes an objective function where the priors are seen as a regularization or diffusion term. Independently of such interpretations, MAP estimates are implicit functions of the data and of the functions expressing the priors. This point of view enabled the author to exhibit analytical relations between prior functions and the features of the relevant estimates. These results entail important consequences and questions which are the subject of this paper. Namely, they reveal an essential gap between prior models and the way these are effectively involved in a MAP estimate. Hence the question about the rationale of MAP estimation. At the same time, they give precious indications about the hyperparameters and suggest how to construct estimators which indeed respect the priors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Bayesian maximum a posteriori estimation (MAP) is a very popular way to recover unknown signals and images by using jointly observed data and priors formulated as a probability law. In a variational context, a MAP estimate minimizes an objective function where the priors are seen as a regularization or diffusion term. Independently of such interpretations, MAP estimates are implicit functions of the data and of the functions expressing the priors. This point of view enabled the author to exhibit analytical relations between prior functions and the features of the relevant estimates. These results entail important consequences and questions which are the subject of this paper. Namely, they reveal an essential gap between prior models and the way these are effectively involved in a MAP estimate. Hence the question about the rationale of MAP estimation. At the same time, they give precious indications about the hyperparameters and suggest how to construct estimators which indeed respect the priors.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Bayesian maximum a posteriori estimation (MAP) is a very popular way to recover unknown signals and images by using jointly observed data and priors formulated as a probability law. In a variational context, a MAP estimate minimizes an objective function where the priors are seen as a regularization or diffusion term. Independently of such interpretations, MAP estimates are implicit functions of the data and of the functions expressing the priors. This point of view enabled the author to exhibit analytical relations between prior functions and the features of the relevant estimates. These results entail important consequences and questions which are the subject of this paper. Namely, they reveal an essential gap between prior models and the way these are effectively involved in a MAP estimate. Hence the question about the rationale of MAP estimation. At the same time, they give precious indications about the hyperparameters and suggest how to construct estimators which indeed respect the priors.

Key concepts: Prior probability, Maximum a posteriori estimation, Hyperparameter, Estimator, Bayesian probability, Computer science, Context (archaeology), Bayes estimator

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assumed and effective priors in Bayesian MAP estimation — Research Paper | ScholarLens