1983PubMedRequires access

A comparison of three means of pressurized aerosol inhaler use.

Stanley W. Epstein, J E Parsons, Paul Corey, Geoffrey Worsley, Paul Reilly

Open publisher page 29 citations

Abstract

The bronchodilator response to 200 micrograms of fenoterol hydrobromide using 3 different methods of inhalation from a pressurized aerosol metered-dose inhaler, was studied in 13 asthmatic patients. On 4 separate days and in random order, patients received either placebo aerosol or fenoterol aerosol delivered by the patients' own technique, delivered under supervision by a trained member of our staff, and delivered with a spacer device (Aerochamber) attached to the pressurized canister. There was no significant difference in the response to the 3 methods of active drug administration, but there was a significant difference (p less than 0.05) from the placebo control values. Thus, in this group of asthmatics the patients' own method of inhalation, using the standard dose of 200 micrograms of fenoterol from a pressurized aerosol metered-dose inhaler, appears to be as effective a means of bronchodilation as the other techniques used in this study.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The bronchodilator response to 200 micrograms of fenoterol hydrobromide using 3 different methods of inhalation from a pressurized aerosol metered-dose inhaler, was studied in 13 asthmatic patients. On 4 separate days and in random order, patients received either placebo aerosol or fenoterol aerosol delivered by the patients' own technique, delivered under supervision by a trained member of our staff, and delivered with a spacer device (Aerochamber) attached to the pressurized canister. There was no significant difference in the response to the 3 methods of active drug administration, but there was a significant difference (p less than 0.05) from the placebo control values. Thus, in this group of asthmatics the patients' own method of inhalation, using the standard dose of 200 micrograms of fenoterol from a pressurized aerosol metered-dose inhaler, appears to be as effective a means of bronchodilation as the other techniques used in this study.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The bronchodilator response to 200 micrograms of fenoterol hydrobromide using 3 different methods of inhalation from a pressurized aerosol metered-dose inhaler, was studied in 13 asthmatic patients. On 4 separate days and in random order, patients received either placebo aerosol or fenoterol aerosol delivered by the patients' own technique, delivered under supervision by a trained member of our staff, and delivered with a spacer device (Aerochamber) attached to the pressurized canister. There was no significant difference in the response to the 3 methods of active drug administration, but there was a significant difference (p less than 0.05) from the placebo control values. Thus, in this group of asthmatics the patients' own method of inhalation, using the standard dose of 200 micrograms of fenoterol from a pressurized aerosol metered-dose inhaler, appears to be as effective a means of bronchodilation as the other techniques used in this study.

Key concepts: Fenoterol, Metered-dose inhaler, Bronchodilator, Inhaler, Bronchodilation, Inhalation, Medicine, Placebo

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparison of three means of pressurized aerosol inhaler use. — Research Paper | ScholarLens