Moral Skepticism and Justification
Walter Sinnott‐Armstrong
Abstract
Open-access reader
Walter Sinnott‐Armstrong
Abstract
Open-access reader
3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper vi Prefacealso emphasizes the social dimension of morality, although from a feminist perspective, and argues that a certain kind of negotiation within society can lead to justification for some moral claims.Finally, Mark Timmons defends the contextualist view that some moral beliefs can be justified by reference to unjustified moral assumptions in certain contexts.Although there are other possible moves, these essays cover most of the main approaches to moral epistemology.Further readings in these and other theories about moral epistemology can be found in the annotated bibliography prepared by Mitch Haney.Despite the contributors' disagreements, this book is truly a collaborative effort.Early versions of each essay were mailed to each contributor.We then held a conference at Dartmouth College, where everyone had a chance to comment on everyone else's work.A flurry of written exchanges followed.We all benefitted from the close scrutiny of the other contributors, as well as of the other participants at the conference.
OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper vi Prefacealso emphasizes the social dimension of morality, although from a feminist perspective, and argues that a certain kind of negotiation within society can lead to justification for some moral claims.Finally, Mark Timmons defends the contextualist view that some moral beliefs can be justified by reference to unjustified moral assumptions in certain contexts.Although there are other possible moves, these essays cover most of the main approaches to moral epistemology.Further readings in these and other theories about moral epistemology can be found in the annotated bibliography prepared by Mitch Haney.Despite the contributors' disagreements, this book is truly a collaborative effort.Early versions of each essay were mailed to each contributor.We then held a conference at Dartmouth College, where everyone had a chance to comment on everyone else's work.A flurry of written exchanges followed.We all benefitted from the close scrutiny of the other contributors, as well as of the other participants at the conference.
Key concepts: Skepticism, Epistemology, Philosophy, Environmental ethics, Political science