1996PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)Open access

Moral Skepticism and Justification

Walter Sinnott‐Armstrong

Open full text 25 citations

Abstract

3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper vi Prefacealso emphasizes the social dimension of morality, although from a feminist perspective, and argues that a certain kind of negotiation within society can lead to justification for some moral claims.Finally, Mark Timmons defends the contextualist view that some moral beliefs can be justified by reference to unjustified moral assumptions in certain contexts.Although there are other possible moves, these essays cover most of the main approaches to moral epistemology.Further readings in these and other theories about moral epistemology can be found in the annotated bibliography prepared by Mitch Haney.Despite the contributors' disagreements, this book is truly a collaborative effort.Early versions of each essay were mailed to each contributor.We then held a conference at Dartmouth College, where everyone had a chance to comment on everyone else's work.A flurry of written exchanges followed.We all benefitted from the close scrutiny of the other contributors, as well as of the other participants at the conference.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper vi Prefacealso emphasizes the social dimension of morality, although from a feminist perspective, and argues that a certain kind of negotiation within society can lead to justification for some moral claims.Finally, Mark Timmons defends the contextualist view that some moral beliefs can be justified by reference to unjustified moral assumptions in certain contexts.Although there are other possible moves, these essays cover most of the main approaches to moral epistemology.Further readings in these and other theories about moral epistemology can be found in the annotated bibliography prepared by Mitch Haney.Despite the contributors' disagreements, this book is truly a collaborative effort.Early versions of each essay were mailed to each contributor.We then held a conference at Dartmouth College, where everyone had a chance to comment on everyone else's work.A flurry of written exchanges followed.We all benefitted from the close scrutiny of the other contributors, as well as of the other participants at the conference.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper vi Prefacealso emphasizes the social dimension of morality, although from a feminist perspective, and argues that a certain kind of negotiation within society can lead to justification for some moral claims.Finally, Mark Timmons defends the contextualist view that some moral beliefs can be justified by reference to unjustified moral assumptions in certain contexts.Although there are other possible moves, these essays cover most of the main approaches to moral epistemology.Further readings in these and other theories about moral epistemology can be found in the annotated bibliography prepared by Mitch Haney.Despite the contributors' disagreements, this book is truly a collaborative effort.Early versions of each essay were mailed to each contributor.We then held a conference at Dartmouth College, where everyone had a chance to comment on everyone else's work.A flurry of written exchanges followed.We all benefitted from the close scrutiny of the other contributors, as well as of the other participants at the conference.

Key concepts: Skepticism, Epistemology, Philosophy, Environmental ethics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Moral Skepticism and Justification — Research Paper | ScholarLens