1971Journal of Animal ScienceRequires access

Feeder Lamb Response to Chlortetracycline-Sulfamethazine Supplementation

Gary Stephan Ternus, R. L. Vetter, Michael M. Danley

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Three feeding experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of adding a combination of chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine to finishing lamb rations. In the first experiment, two levels of chlortetracycline-sulfamethazine supplementation (55 mg of each/ kg ration and 110 mg of each/kg ration) resulted in improvement (P<.01) in average daily gain, while chlortetracycline alone (55 mg/kg ration) did not affect lamb performance. In experiment 2, supplementing with chlortetracycline-sulfamethazine (110 mg of each/kg ration) significantly increased gains (P<.01). In a third experiment, chlortetracycline-sulfamethazine (55 mg of each/kg ration) resulted in a 7% increase in average daily gain. This difference was nonsignificant (P>.05). Out of a total of 240 lambs in three experiments, only three lambs died from enterotoxemia, and these were receiving the control ration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three feeding experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of adding a combination of chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine to finishing lamb rations. In the first experiment, two levels of chlortetracycline-sulfamethazine supplementation (55 mg of each/ kg ration and 110 mg of each/kg ration) resulted in improvement (P<.01) in average daily gain, while chlortetracycline alone (55 mg/kg ration) did not affect lamb performance. In experiment 2, supplementing with chlortetracycline-sulfamethazine (110 mg of each/kg ration) significantly increased gains (P<.01). In a third experiment, chlortetracycline-sulfamethazine (55 mg of each/kg ration) resulted in a 7% increase in average daily gain. This difference was nonsignificant (P>.05). Out of a total of 240 lambs in three experiments, only three lambs died from enterotoxemia, and these were receiving the control ration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three feeding experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of adding a combination of chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine to finishing lamb rations. In the first experiment, two levels of chlortetracycline-sulfamethazine supplementation (55 mg of each/ kg ration and 110 mg of each/kg ration) resulted in improvement (P<.01) in average daily gain, while chlortetracycline alone (55 mg/kg ration) did not affect lamb performance. In experiment 2, supplementing with chlortetracycline-sulfamethazine (110 mg of each/kg ration) significantly increased gains (P<.01). In a third experiment, chlortetracycline-sulfamethazine (55 mg of each/kg ration) resulted in a 7% increase in average daily gain. This difference was nonsignificant (P>.05). Out of a total of 240 lambs in three experiments, only three lambs died from enterotoxemia, and these were receiving the control ration.

Key concepts: Chlortetracycline, Animal science, Chemistry, Oxytetracycline, Biology, Food science, Antibiotics, Microbiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Feeder Lamb Response to Chlortetracycline-Sulfamethazine Supplementation — Research Paper | ScholarLens