The use and development of academic vocabulary in second language writing: a longitudinal investigation
John Turlik
Abstract
Open-access reader
John Turlik
Abstract
Open-access reader
Recent years have seen the increasing use of vocabulary frequency lists such as 'the 1,000 most frequent words in English' to assess the difficulty of reading texts, as well as the development of learners' language. This paper reports on a longitudinal study of university essays in English, written every ten weeks under examination conditions, over a period of two years by 42 Arabic-speaking students. The expectation was that students’ use of academic vocabulary would begin with those words used most frequently in academic English and, as their vocabulary developed, draw increasingly from less commonly-used words. The evidence from this study of written output suggests that the frequency lists, which are based on academic usage by (near-)native users of English, may not be as applicable as thought for modelling the development of vocabulary use in learners of English as a second or foreign language.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Recent years have seen the increasing use of vocabulary frequency lists such as 'the 1,000 most frequent words in English' to assess the difficulty of reading texts, as well as the development of learners' language. This paper reports on a longitudinal study of university essays in English, written every ten weeks under examination conditions, over a period of two years by 42 Arabic-speaking students. The expectation was that students’ use of academic vocabulary would begin with those words used most frequently in academic English and, as their vocabulary developed, draw increasingly from less commonly-used words. The evidence from this study of written output suggests that the frequency lists, which are based on academic usage by (near-)native users of English, may not be as applicable as thought for modelling the development of vocabulary use in learners of English as a second or foreign language.
Key concepts: Vocabulary, Reading (process), Linguistics, Arabic, Period (music), Vocabulary development, Longitudinal study, Foreign language