2013Strategic Entrepreneurship JournalRequires access

Explaining the Variance in Underpricing among Venture Capital‐Backed IPOs : A Comparison Between Private and Corporate VC Firms

Xiaodan “Abby” Wang, William P. Wan

Open publisher page 43 citations

Abstract

In this study, we argue from the resource‐based view and multiple agency theory that private and corporate VC firms have different impacts on IPO underpricing among VC ‐backed IPOs due to their different interests, motivations, and resources. Private VC firms are primarily financial oriented, but corporate VC firms generally are strategic in orientation. Using a sample of 200 VC ‐backed IPOs from 2000 to 2007, we found support for the hypotheses that among VC ‐backed IPOs , private VC ownership is positively associated with underpricing, whereas corporate VC ownership is negatively associated with underpricing. Copyright © 2013 Strategic Management Society.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study, we argue from the resource‐based view and multiple agency theory that private and corporate VC firms have different impacts on IPO underpricing among VC ‐backed IPOs due to their different interests, motivations, and resources. Private VC firms are primarily financial oriented, but corporate VC firms generally are strategic in orientation. Using a sample of 200 VC ‐backed IPOs from 2000 to 2007, we found support for the hypotheses that among VC ‐backed IPOs , private VC ownership is positively associated with underpricing, whereas corporate VC ownership is negatively associated with underpricing. Copyright © 2013 Strategic Management Society.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study, we argue from the resource‐based view and multiple agency theory that private and corporate VC firms have different impacts on IPO underpricing among VC ‐backed IPOs due to their different interests, motivations, and resources. Private VC firms are primarily financial oriented, but corporate VC firms generally are strategic in orientation. Using a sample of 200 VC ‐backed IPOs from 2000 to 2007, we found support for the hypotheses that among VC ‐backed IPOs , private VC ownership is positively associated with underpricing, whereas corporate VC ownership is negatively associated with underpricing. Copyright © 2013 Strategic Management Society.

Key concepts: Initial public offering, Business, Venture capital, Sample (material), Principal–agent problem, Agency (philosophy), Accounting, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Explaining the Variance in Underpricing among Venture Capital‐Backed IPOs : A Comparison Between Private and Corporate VC Firms — Research Paper | ScholarLens