2013Review of International EconomicsRequires access

Does it Matter Who You Sign With? Comparing the Impacts of N orth– S outh and S outh– S outh Trade Agreements on Bilateral Trade

Alberto Behar, Laia Cirera

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

Abstract Free trade agreements (FTAs) lead to a rise in bilateral trade regardless of whether the signatories are developed or developing countries. Furthermore, the percentage increase in bilateral trade is higher forSouth–South agreements than forNorth–South agreements. The results are robust across a number of gravity model specifications in which we control for the endogeneity ofFTAs(with bilateral fixed effects) and also take account of multilateral resistance in both estimation (with country‐time fixed effects) and comparative statics (analytically). Our analytical model shows that multilateral resistance dampens the impact ofFTAson trade by less inSouth–South agreements than inNorth–South agreements, which accentuates the difference implied by our gravity model coefficients, and that this difference becomes larger as the number of signatories rises. For example, allowing for lags and multilateral resistance, a four‐countryNorth–South agreement raises bilateral trade by 53% while the analogousSouth–South impact is 107%.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Free trade agreements (FTAs) lead to a rise in bilateral trade regardless of whether the signatories are developed or developing countries. Furthermore, the percentage increase in bilateral trade is higher forSouth–South agreements than forNorth–South agreements. The results are robust across a number of gravity model specifications in which we control for the endogeneity ofFTAs(with bilateral fixed effects) and also take account of multilateral resistance in both estimation (with country‐time fixed effects) and comparative statics (analytically). Our analytical model shows that multilateral resistance dampens the impact ofFTAson trade by less inSouth–South agreements than inNorth–South agreements, which accentuates the difference implied by our gravity model coefficients, and that this difference becomes larger as the number of signatories rises. For example, allowing for lags and multilateral resistance, a four‐countryNorth–South agreement raises bilateral trade by 53% while the analogousSouth–South impact is 107%.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Free trade agreements (FTAs) lead to a rise in bilateral trade regardless of whether the signatories are developed or developing countries. Furthermore, the percentage increase in bilateral trade is higher forSouth–South agreements than forNorth–South agreements. The results are robust across a number of gravity model specifications in which we control for the endogeneity ofFTAs(with bilateral fixed effects) and also take account of multilateral resistance in both estimation (with country‐time fixed effects) and comparative statics (analytically). Our analytical model shows that multilateral resistance dampens the impact ofFTAson trade by less inSouth–South agreements than inNorth–South agreements, which accentuates the difference implied by our gravity model coefficients, and that this difference becomes larger as the number of signatories rises. For example, allowing for lags and multilateral resistance, a four‐countryNorth–South agreement raises bilateral trade by 53% while the analogousSouth–South impact is 107%.

Key concepts: Endogeneity, Economics, Gravity model of trade, Bilateral trade, International economics, International trade, Econometrics, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does it Matter Who You Sign With? Comparing the Impacts of N orth– S outh and S outh– S outh Trade Agreements on Bilateral Trade — Research Paper | ScholarLens