1998•PubMedOpen access

Diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms: accuracy of MR angiography at 0.5 T.

Cécile B.G. Grandin, Philippe Mathurin, Thierry Philippe Jacques Duprez, G Stroobandt, Frank Hammer, Pierre P. Goffette, Guy Cosnard

Open full text 48 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our goal was to determine the accuracy of MR angiography at 0.5 T for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 140 patients, 70 with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage, who were either at high or low risk for intracranial aneurysm. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography was typically performed to cover the circle of Willis, with a volume thickness of 30 mm. Conventional spin-echo MR images and MR angiograms were reviewed together, and the results were compared with those obtained at intraarterial cerebral angiography to determine the sensitivity and specificity of MR angiography. RESULTS: Eighty-nine aneurysms (size range, 2 to 27 mm; 25 aneurysms < 5 mm) were identified at intraarterial cerebral angiography. Six aneurysms were missed by MR angiography and two were doubtful (sensitivity, 91% to 93%; specificity, 100%). Missed aneurysms were located outside the MR angiographic acquisition volume (n = 3) or on the carotid siphon (n = 3; size = 2, 3, and 5 mm). CONCLUSION: Even if MR angiography presents some restrictions in acquisition volume and spatial resolution, the detection rate of intracranial aneurysms is excellent at 0.5 T in both asymptomatic patients and in those with subarachnoid hemorrhage. A midfield system is not a restriction to the detection of intracranial aneurysms by MR examination.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: Our goal was to determine the accuracy of MR angiography at 0.5 T for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 140 patients, 70 with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage, who were either at high or low risk for intracranial aneurysm. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography was typically performed to cover the circle of Willis, with a volume thickness of 30 mm. Conventional spin-echo MR images and MR angiograms were reviewed together, and the results were compared with those obtained at intraarterial cerebral angiography to determine the sensitivity and specificity of MR angiography. RESULTS: Eighty-nine aneurysms (size range, 2 to 27 mm; 25 aneurysms < 5 mm) were identified at intraarterial cerebral angiography. Six aneurysms were missed by MR angiography and two were doubtful (sensitivity, 91% to 93%; specificity, 100%). Missed aneurysms were located outside the MR angiographic acquisition volume (n = 3) or on the carotid siphon (n = 3; size = 2, 3, and 5 mm). CONCLUSION: Even if MR angiography presents some restrictions in acquisition volume and spatial resolution, the detection rate of intracranial aneurysms is excellent at 0.5 T in both asymptomatic patients and in those with subarachnoid hemorrhage. A midfield system is not a restriction to the detection of intracranial aneurysms by MR examination.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: Our goal was to determine the accuracy of MR angiography at 0.5 T for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 140 patients, 70 with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage, who were either at high or low risk for intracranial aneurysm. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography was typically performed to cover the circle of Willis, with a volume thickness of 30 mm. Conventional spin-echo MR images and MR angiograms were reviewed together, and the results were compared with those obtained at intraarterial cerebral angiography to determine the sensitivity and specificity of MR angiography. RESULTS: Eighty-nine aneurysms (size range, 2 to 27 mm; 25 aneurysms < 5 mm) were identified at intraarterial cerebral angiography. Six aneurysms were missed by MR angiography and two were doubtful (sensitivity, 91% to 93%; specificity, 100%). Missed aneurysms were located outside the MR angiographic acquisition volume (n = 3) or on the carotid siphon (n = 3; size = 2, 3, and 5 mm). CONCLUSION: Even if MR angiography presents some restrictions in acquisition volume and spatial resolution, the detection rate of intracranial aneurysms is excellent at 0.5 T in both asymptomatic patients and in those with subarachnoid hemorrhage. A midfield system is not a restriction to the detection of intracranial aneurysms by MR examination.

Key concepts: Medicine, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, Aneurysm, Radiology, Angiography, Cerebral angiography, Circle of Willis, Asymptomatic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms: accuracy of MR angiography at 0.5 T. — Research Paper | ScholarLens